![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Look at the Tomahawk Block 1's as compared to what Tomahawk is now with the Tactical Tomahawk. Tomahawks can now be used as loitering recon vehicles, can re-target, has capabilities to carry high-energy weapons to fry land or ship based electronics. And Tomahawk now has jamming and incredibly low RCS for survivability. And not just improvements in weapons. Everywhere you look, there are continual improvements in acoustic quieting and sensor upgrades in American subs as well. All in all, this speech by Polmar looks to be old (1997?). The same kind of overblown 'fright' speeches were being made in regards to keeping funding alive for F-22/ F-35 programs as well. I think Polmar just wants to assure that the U.S. sub force doesn't lose the edge. For that he should be commended. But I'm not willing to believe that things are so dire, especially when the evidence points the other way. Sea Demon |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|