SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-22-05, 02:24 AM   #5
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
This is a really interesting expert position statement for those of you interested in discussions along this line.
Interesting read. But I take any of this with a grain of salt. Norman Polmar says there has been virtually no "front-end" innovations in American submarines. That's actually quite laughable. The U.S. has been improving Mk-48 ADCAP technology non-stop. It is one of the best, if not the best torpedo in the world. I wonder what Norman would have to say about the guidance and control Mods and torpedo propulsion mods that have been added through multiple block versions. What about the improved performance in Software Block 3? What about the Block 4 that added significant capabilities in software algorithms and enhanced other electronics. What about the technologies being incorporated into CBASS? I hear there are plans into Block 7 to begin developing a new generation torpedo? "No innovation" ?!?! That is just........ignorant.

Look at the Tomahawk Block 1's as compared to what Tomahawk is now with the Tactical Tomahawk. Tomahawks can now be used as loitering recon vehicles, can re-target, has capabilities to carry high-energy weapons to fry land or ship based electronics. And Tomahawk now has jamming and incredibly low RCS for survivability. And not just improvements in weapons. Everywhere you look, there are continual improvements in acoustic quieting and sensor upgrades in American subs as well.

All in all, this speech by Polmar looks to be old (1997?). The same kind of overblown 'fright' speeches were being made in regards to keeping funding alive for F-22/ F-35 programs as well. I think Polmar just wants to assure that the U.S. sub force doesn't lose the edge. For that he should be commended. But I'm not willing to believe that things are so dire, especially when the evidence points the other way.

Sea Demon
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.