Muhammad's ball, or: what Islam has done to the French National Team

The map looks like a left-winger's dream come true.

It's not too late to stop that, . . . . yet.

[MH]

Originally Posted by Snestorm

The map looks like a left-winger's dream come true.

It's not too late to stop that, . . . . yet.

Originally Posted by Snestorm

The map looks like a left-winger's dream come true.

It's not too late to stop that, . . . . yet.

Just watch out in the progress. Or they might call you a worst enemy of your own state .......

Isn't it supreme irony when two Jewish members from a country that is highly dependant on immigration and has been since its first proposal are having a laugh with a real anti immigrant who has this thing about racial purity of the supreme nordic aryan race and the threat impurity of blood poses to the blond haired blue eyed people.

BTW Demitiri you were called the worst enemy of your own state because you support views that even the head of Mossad says are harmful to the state.

[Foxtrot]

In other news (which should not go under your radar birdy )

Leftists harass Muslims for supporting Germany

Leftist anarchists in Berlin have reportedly been harassing Muslim immigrants showing their support for the German football team during the World Cup, tearing down national flags and even setting one on fire.

Here they have made a point of destroying and removing Germany flags hanging outside shops and vehicles because they believe the proud patriotism hearkens back to the ugly nationalism of the Third Reich, the paper said.

A group calling itself "Kommando Kevin-Prince Boateng" posted a notice on the website Indymedia calling on leftists to “capture” all Germany flags across the country. The name refers to the Berlin-born footballer, who is playing for Ghana at the world cup and knocked German team captain Michael Ballack out of the tournament with a brutal foul in the FA Cup final in May.

One Arab-German family has sparked their ire by hanging a giant Germany flag on their Sonnenallee building in support of the football team during the World Cup.

Ibrahim Bassal, who owns a mobile phone shop in the district, told daily Berliner Morgenpost on Saturday that since he and his cousin hoisted the flag they have had several uncomfortable encounters with the local leftists.

“During the day people from the left-wing scene come by and insult us,” Bassal said. “Am I not allowed to be proud of Germany?”

Bassal and his cousin Badr Mohammed, a well-known conservative Christian Democratic Berlin politician who lives in the same building, worked together to get the 20-metre-long flag, which cost them €500.

In recent days the situation has escalated, with the anarchists attempting to remove the flag four times and even setting it on fire, the paper reported. On one occasion a group managed to gain access to the roof of the building and cut the flag down.

Last Friday evening some 16 people dressed in typical black anarchist garb confronted Bassal in his shop, and the mood was tense, the paper said.

After Germany’s World Cup victory over Ghana last week Bassal reportedly stayed up to look after his shop until 4 am.

“They see us as immigrants,” he said. “They don’t understand that Germans who aren’t from Germany would defend Germany.”

Both Bassal and Mohammed told Berliner Morgenpost that they are incredulous they have to defend hanging a German flag to native Germans.

Though the store owner’s entire family have been citizens for many years, the leftists believe immigrants must remain foreigners, he added.

Meanwhile many of the residents of Arab or Turkish descent who live in the multicultural district are defending the huge flag and continuing to show their support, the paper reported.

The family has organised nighttime surveillance of the flag with neighbours to prevent further attacks, they said.

“We won’t let our pride be taken away,” Bassal and Mohammed said.

But according to Der Tagesspiegel, Bassal has decided to remove the flag and hoist it only on days when there is a Germany match. Meanwhile other residents told the paper they were taking special care not to leave their flags unattended.

http://www.thelocal.de/society/20100628-28147.html

Now in which group are we going to put these folks? Should we also send them back as a couple of posters in this thread pointed out?

[MH]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Isn't it supreme irony when two Jewish members from a country that is highly dependant on immigration and has been since its first proposal are having a laugh with a real anti immigrant who has this thing about racial purity of the supreme nordic aryan race and the threat impurity of blood poses to the blond haired blue eyed people.

BTW Demitiri you were called the worst enemy of your own state because you support views that even the head of Mossad says are harmful to the state.

Enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Seriusly...i personally realize that there are many kinds of people(Muslim) as i live in Jerusalem.(half of Jerusalem is Arab"s)
The problem is that its impossible to deal with trouble makers without hell braking lose about racism.
As some of you don't want to be labeled as antisemitic when criticizing Israel why you label someone as racist when doing the same with Arabs?
There are many examples of that here in Israel regarding Israeli Palestinians(the ones that live inside 67 Israel-don't want to be part of Palestinian state-just trust me on that) and lefties as well.
Some times people trying to be right(left) or idealistic at all coast and lose sense of reality.
I'm not saying also that I'm not suspicious of Israeli Palestinians as whole.
I admit I'm.
I'm afraid that when **** hits the fun here for real and they sense weakness on Israeli side we will have here whole kind of new "intifada".
I hope I'm wrong here but well...thats my feeling and i think its quite realistic but is it racist?

As some of you don't want to be labeled as antisemitic when criticizing Israel why you label someone as racist when doing the same with Arabs?

Thats easy
Well for starters not all Israelis are Jewish and not all Jews are Israelis, so Israel is just a country with its own individual policies and actions.
So when you want to criticise arabs which arabs do you mean and which policies from which countries, or which particular religion of arabs are you on about?

I just found it funny that Dimitri and yourself appear in agreement with someone who believes any dilution of pure nordic bloodstock amounts to genocide and that people contaminated with any cross breeding must be expelled, which seems rather like a political theory from 1930s germany.

What makes it funnier is the kick them all back to where they came from angle when many of the people in the articles are living where they come from, plus of course dimitri blowing a fuse the other week in outrage when that dumb journalist made exactly the same sort of comment.

As for "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line, what utter tripe.
For example take Americas foriegn policy as a measure over the past 70 year, how many dozens of times has that line turned round and humiliatingly bitten them in the arse.

Now in which group are we going to put these folks? Should we also send them back as a couple of posters in this thread pointed out?

Thats an interesting one, where to send someone from a state somewhere else when they don't recognise states.
An impossibility it would seem as no matter where you sent them they would still be in the same place.

BTW Demitiri you were called the worst enemy of your own state because you support views that even the head of Mossad says are harmful to the state.

What kind of views and what kind of harm? I attacked a person because he is shaking his hand with Iranian president who want my country,America and everything non Islamic destroyed. It seems to me that you simply don`t like what i `am saying so you making our own versions. Big surprise!! . While we at it i never supported genocide in any form towards ANY nation and i never support other with that kind of views, from you however i hear the issue of race almost every time. Self conviction is a strong argument, especially if someone don`t follow your way . Very low and pathetic way to draw attention to something else if you ask me.

[MH]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Thats easy
Well for starters not all Israelis are Jewish and not all Jews are Israelis, so Israel is just a country with its own individual policies and actions.
So when you want to criticise arabs which arabs do you mean and which policies from which countries, or which particular religion of arabs are you on about?
.

Im about Muslims for most part.
Christian Israeli Palestinians somehow assimilate themselves much better into Israeli society than Muslims.
They still call themselves Arabs/Palestinians but have much less ideological/mental problems to be Israeli.
Israel is like a small lab where you can see how all kind of different religions mix together and how they interact and Islam is the troublesome.

Originally Posted by Tribesman

As for "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line, what utter tripe.
For example take Americas foriegn policy as a measure over the past 70 year, how many dozens of times has that line turned round and humiliatingly bitten them in the arse.

Please...it just poped to my mind.

Originally Posted by Tribesman

I just found it funny that Dimitri and yourself appear in agreement with someone who believes any dilution of pure nordic bloodstock amounts to genocide and that people contaminated with any cross breeding must be expelled, which seems rather like a political theory from 1930s germany.
.

I did not get this kind impression from any one in this thread.
Maybe you try too hard to read between the lines or i missed something.

I did not get this kind impression from any one in this thread.
Maybe you try too hard to read between the lines or i missed something.

Thats because it relates to what they have written before about cross breeding the nordic race being the same as murder.It resulted in a moderator writing

Anyhow I would advise people to tread carefully when it comes to expressing concepts of genetic (racial) purity and other such stuff. We don't take too kindly to that sort of talk round these here parts

Check birthrates.

Bingo, Skybirds demographic timebomb.
Please post that demographics video again, its hilarious.

The sami people have been where they are as long as we've been where we are.

So can they have their own homeland too, after all everyone needs their own livingroom. Come to think of it as the Sami are indigenous and the north germanic tribes are the immigrants shouldn't they get all the land as their homeland

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by MH

Enemy of my enemy is my friend

Not alway. Sometimes the enemy of my enemy - still is my enemy as well. The US foreign policy lives a lot by your assumption, especially in the Middle and Far East. And it has screwed up so often that one can ask if there even is any realistic middle east policy in the state departement that is worth the name. US middle east policy is at least as dilletantic and shortsighted as is the European middle east policy - and considering the infantility of the EU, that description really means something.

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Isn't it supreme irony when two Jewish members from a country that is highly dependant on immigration and has been since its first proposal are having a laugh with a real anti immigrant who has this thing about racial purity of the supreme nordic aryan race and the threat impurity of blood poses to the blond haired blue eyed people.

BTW Demitiri you were called the worst enemy of your own state because you support views that even the head of Mossad says are harmful to the state.

You realy are at a loss when people's actions don't fit into your preconcieved picturebook, aren't you?

Just for the record, I consider myself scandinavian, not "aryan".

I believe that people have a right to their own homeland.
(Can you see some common ground here, Tribesman?)

Just for the record, I consider myself scandinavian, not "aryan".

So is that the blond haired blue eyed nordic race which was used interchangably with aryan by the nazis and neo-nazis or do you include thishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saami_Family_1900.jpg scandanavian group as your blond haired blue eyed people who would be being murdered in an act of genocide by any dilution of their bloodline.

Originally Posted by Tribesman

So is that the blond haired blue eyed nordic race which was used interchangably with aryan by the nazis and neo-nazis or do you include thishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saami_Family_1900.jpg scandanavian group as your blond haired blue eyed people who would be being murdered in an act of genocide by any dilution of their bloodline.

"The Nordic Countries" does include Finland.
"The Scandinavian Countries" does not include Finland.
Neither terminology includes Germany, so I don't know where this "aryan" concept comes from.