|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: How has the design and quality of SH5 affected your purchase decisions? | |||
| I have not purchased SH5 because of the "always on line" requirement |
   
|
82 | 38.68% |
| I have not purchased SH5 because of poor quality and/or design |
  
|
69 | 32.55% |
| I have purchased SH5 but I am unhappy with the "always on line" requirement |
  
|
42 | 19.81% |
| I have purchased SH5 but I am unhappy with the product quality/design |
  
|
61 | 28.77% |
| I will purchase SH5 if the "always on line" requirement is removed |
  
|
47 | 22.17% |
| I will purchase SH5 if quality and design issues are addressed |
  
|
29 | 13.68% |
| I will not purchase any future UBI product with an "always on line" requirement |
|
71 | 33.49% |
| I will not purchase any future UBI products under any circumstances |
|
16 | 7.55% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-23-10, 06:12 PM
|
#17 |
|
Ace of the Deep
 Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
|
I don't see the point in bashing UBISoft. If they had not developed the SH series were would we be today?
 As I see it they got a lot of things wrong...but they also got a whole lot more right.Even hardcore Anti-UBIs should admit that they have listened to us and what it was we all wanted...at least after the SHII disaster they began to hear us.. Sure they don't always understand completely what we tell them but they have tried. I understand that not everone on planet earth is a hardcore Sub sim fan so the game developers,working without our depth of knowledge, interpret what we tell them as best they can. So the results are a mixed blessing. But what if there were no subsims at all to play? 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode