The President has a new enemy...

[krashkart]

The term I use is 'Doofus' -- or 'doofii' when referring to Washington as a larger entity. Calling him a traitor is a bit rash for me at this point. I'll let history sort that one out.

[Zachstar]

Ahh good the bad state of Arizona will now get to prove that the law isn't racist and something other than "Show me your papers"

Why are people so against Arizona enacting its right to create tougher laws on immigration?

Because the law ain't gonna work and is just about impossible to enforce without violating civil rights. Which also makes it unconstitutional so that means the ferderal government has to take action against it.

The shrill screams of racism and profiling are from people who have never bothered to read it

Well done, thats the second time someone has done that

[krashkart]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Well done, thats the second time someone has done that

It's so true that it made me chuckle a bit. I must have missed the first one, though.

It's so true that it made me chuckle a bit. I must have missed the first one, though.

The first one was even funnier as they provided that same link, then after some ridicule provided the new legislation in a second link yet insisted the first link was really the same as the second link and that it was the second link they posted first.

[Platapus]

If the Arizona is so sure its law is constitutional, why is Arizona concerned about getting sued by the Federal Government?

If people on this forum are also convinced that the Arizona law is constitutional, why get upset if it is challenged.

Let the case go to trial and let the judicial system decide. That's how things are SUPPOSED to work in this country.

If there is a disagreement between states and the federal government, we don't take up arms (as has been suggested in this forum). Civilized governments bring their disagreements to the judicial system and each side is allowed to present their case. No violence, no rioting

People get spun up here way too easy.

[krashkart]

^^ Thank you. A breath of fresh air.

If there is a disagreement between states and the federal government, we don't take up arms (as has been suggested in this forum).

But Obama is going to bring in martial law, cancel elections, open the borders and going to force all hispanics to vote for him in canceled elections under martial law that might also be sharia law as he is foriegn and a muslim as well as being a traitor and a communist who is under big business and the global media conspiracy...so really there is no choice but to take up arms

[August]

I would note that despite threats made to foreign governments, as of yet the Federal government has not sued Arizona. Personally I think they won't lest they get defeated.

[SteamWake]

Originally Posted by Platapus

If the Arizona is so sure its law is constitutional, why is Arizona concerned about getting sued by the Federal Government?

If people on this forum are also convinced that the Arizona law is constitutional, why get upset if it is challenged.

Let the case go to trial and let the judicial system decide. That's how things are SUPPOSED to work in this country.

If there is a disagreement between states and the federal government, we don't take up arms (as has been suggested in this forum). Civilized governments bring their disagreements to the judicial system and each side is allowed to present their case. No violence, no rioting

People get spun up here way too easy.

So a state enacts a law to allow them to enforce the Federal law and the Fed's seek to sue them over it.. yes... makes perfect sense to me.

[nikimcbee]

Darth Hillary will take on those waskally Arizonans