SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-10, 06:44 AM   #1
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

My understanding is that the BOP was Halliburtons and that it did not work. Therefore if that is the case then Halliburton should also shoulder the blame.

Nothing to do with Halliburton being evil just because.

All I see is Transocean and Halliburton running very fast from ANY responsibility at all and lumping it all on BP using the "they told us to" trick.

I don't mind Americans being mad, I sympathise for the 1000's of people who are affected by it. I do mind Obama shooting his mouth off with quite frankly undiplomatic language that I think isn't becoming of the President of the most powerful country on the planet.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 08:57 AM   #2
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

http://www.ouramazingplanet.com/info...n-trench-0249/
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 09:14 AM   #3
Weiss Pinguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auburn, Alabama
Posts: 3,333
Downloads: 101
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
Wow
__________________
Weiss Pinguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 01:00 PM   #4
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

The Wiki entry for Deepwater Horizon says that the rig was owned by Transocean and leased to BP.

Quote:
Transocean, the rig owner, operated the rig under the Marshalese flag of convenience.[12] Beginning in 2008, BP Exploration leased the Deepwater Horizon from Transocean Ltd.[12] In October 2009, the contract was extended until 2013.[5][12] The lease contract was worth $544 million, a rate of $496,800 per day.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_horizon
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard

Last edited by krashkart; 06-10-10 at 01:06 PM. Reason: Removed unverified statement of BOP installment by Halliburton
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 01:11 PM   #5
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

How BP handles a coffee spill:
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 01:14 PM   #6
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie View Post
How BP handles a coffee spill:

Ten thumbs up!
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 01:30 PM   #7
OneToughHerring
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krashkart View Post
Ten thumbs up!
Ten? Do you live near Alamogordo? Or in West Virginia? I kid!

But yea, funny stuff. Kevin Costner...

Edit. I nominate mookiemookie's vid as The Funniest Video Posted To Subsim Radioroom In 2010.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 06:03 PM   #8
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,386
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
That is a cool graphic. A good way to put things in perspective. 150 ATM. That's some pressure.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-10, 08:00 PM   #9
CaptainHaplo
Silent Hunter
 
CaptainHaplo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus View Post
My understanding is that the BOP was Halliburtons and that it did not work. Therefore if that is the case then Halliburton should also shoulder the blame.
Ok thank you for clarifying that Xabba.

This may help to sort out the confusion (emphasis added):

Quote:
BP chief operating officer Doug Suttles said interviews with Transocean workers on the rig revealed crewmembers tried to activate the BOP from the rig's bridge before the fire forced them to evacuate, but the BOP did not close off the well.
Suttles also revealed that BP remotely-operated vehicles (ROVs) had hit "subsea access points" that should close the BOP, but that they also failed to trigger the mechanism to shut.
"We don't know why the BOP failed to stop the flow," he said. "Ultimately we will recover the BOP, get it to the surface and find out."
"I'm sure Transocean, who actually owned blowout preventer, will be interested to find out why it didn't work," Suttles said.
Source: http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article213497.ece

By that statement - it would be Transocean who holds the largest responsibility. However, I personally am not willing to let BP off the hook because of it - when they made numerous decisions that created the need for a working BOP in the first place.
__________________
Good Hunting!

Captain Haplo
CaptainHaplo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 02:54 AM   #10
OneToughHerring
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Experts double the size of the oil spill.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_...a/10290238.stm

Nice going UK & US.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 03:31 AM   #11
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
when they made numerous decisions that created the need for a working BOP in the first place.
Apologies I thought Halliburton owned it.

As a matter of course whether drilling in shallow or deep water a BOP is required and is common sense.

Yes BP as the project owner is responsible and I won't absolve them, however they are stepping up. Transocean is walking away and letting BP take the flack. The BOP didn't work as it was designed to. It was designed to shear older type pipework. Piping materials have improved, got stronger for an equivalent grade than 20 years ago. That is why the BOP couldn't cut the pipe, that is Transoceans responsibility and they should be chucked under the boot along with BP.

Oh someone sort Pelosi out too.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 05:14 AM   #12
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus View Post
Oh someone sort Pelosi out too.
Get Palin to stop railin' about her new neighbor and we'll talk about the Pelosi thing.


Quote:
Experts double the size of the oil spill.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_...a/10290238.stm

Nice going UK & US.
Double again that size, just to be on the safe side. Now, if you break it down to the owners and operators of the systems that failed, you get the ones that should probably shoulder the blame. That leaves Transocean and BP. Make it a little more complicated by tossing in the government, who appear to have been dragging ass since April, and we almost have a complete list of suspects. Where's Frank Drebbin when you need him?

What part did Halliburton play in building the platform/riser/BOP/(anything else I missed) system? I heard something about a concrete pour for the BOP, was that it?




Howdy Haplo. *wave*
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 05:50 AM   #13
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

I don't know. Looking back I don't think Halliburton have that much to do with it.

It is Transocean and BP who are the biggies.

Seriously though on this side of the Atlantic people are getting fed up with Obama's rhetoric and language and can't help feeling the there is an anti-British sentiment being stirred up and coming out of Obama. Saying that I never thought he cared much for the UK as a partner anyway, or anyone else for that matter.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 06:22 AM   #14
CaptainHaplo
Silent Hunter
 
CaptainHaplo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
In the final stages of closing the well, a concrete "plug" is poured to seal the well. Farther up, another concrete plug is poured to insure its clamped shut. Haliburton was responsible for the concrete pours. After the first one, they noted some problems in writing to both Transocean and BP because the testing indicated there could be some gas still leaking through. This is why the mud cycle should have run for 8-12 hours minimum (to get the mud at the bottom of the pipe up to be checked for gas absorbtion) and that BP only circulated for 30 minutes - not enough by a mile. Had they done so, they would have known they had a gas leak, and it was unsafe to swap the mud out for seawater (which allowed the gas up the pipe and led to the explosion. Normally the mud isn't swapped until the second plug is in place and tested, but BP did get a permit to only use the one, and ignored the warnings that there was a problem.
__________________
Good Hunting!

Captain Haplo
CaptainHaplo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 01:50 PM   #15
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus View Post
Seriously though on this side of the Atlantic...

Which side, US or Europe? I missed the chance to ask earlier.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake View Post
It will be very interisting to see where this leads...



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/10291371.stm
From the graph it looks like the dividend would be healthy. Krashkart read article now...
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.