SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: What platform do you want to see as the next playable in DW?
Arleigh Burke IIA-class 29 19.73%
Virginia-class 25 17.01%
Sierra III-class 3 2.04%
Alfa-class 10 6.80%
Sovremenny-class 10 6.80%
Udaloy II-class 33 22.45%
Ticonderoga III/IV-class 15 10.20%
Other 22 14.97%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-05, 07:40 PM   #1
Apocal
Navy Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 176
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default Your choice on next playable platform in DW?

My vote goes to the Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA (Oscar Austin-class). Take command of arguably the most powerful surface combatant in the world today. In terms of tradeoffs, the Flight IIAs lost their Harpoons (and TACTASS, possibly) in exchange and both CIWS mounts on the all units past the USS Shoup (DDG-86).

The upside however, is that it gains a hangar bay for two embarked helos, additional helo handling equipment, and the RIM-162A Evovled SeaSparrow Missile, in quadpacks mounted inside the VLS, which is significantly more effective against modern seaskimming missiles than CIWS.

I wonder what everyone else is thinking? Since I can only have so many poll options, my first runner up would be an Oscar II-class SSGN.
Apocal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-05, 08:47 PM   #2
Molon Labe
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
Default

The priority really ought to be to add the Russian/Chinese equivalents of the American ASW platforms that DW added to SC, or, by the same logic, a Western diesel-electric. This would round-out the ASW battlespace, which is rather incomplete without the counterparts being in the game.

After that, expanding the game into a better surface and air warfare makes sense. That would be the time to start adding more multirole surface vessles. :|\
Molon Labe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-05, 08:50 PM   #3
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

I would love to see an Arleigh Burke DDG or a new Western Diesel add-on. I definitely voted Arleigh Burke. But if we get a western diesel, I was thinking Japanese Oyashio or Harushio. Even a RAN Collins. And I would love a Virginia SSN add-on as well. But since we only get one vote....I gotta say Arleigh Burke.

Sea Demon

Edited to add a comment and spell-check.
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-05, 08:53 PM   #4
Pigfish
Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 207
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Udaloy II all the way for me, and equally a western diesel. Think 212A.
__________________
Pigfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 12:13 AM   #5
diver
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 213
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Other.

I would love...
RAN Collins class subs
RN type 23 Duke class frigates
RAN OHP FFG, that is with the VLS launched ESSM forward of the mk13
diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 12:51 AM   #6
Orm
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 116
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Other,

A western surface or sub platform that is not American but could be from NATO.
__________________
Orm
Orm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 01:14 AM   #7
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

id love to get into an alfa but then again i thinik the burke class destroyers are great and id love to command one of them
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 01:26 AM   #8
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Udaloy with Ka-27PL Helx and Bear-F support
And a Western SSK, either Upholder/Victoria or Scorpene (AIP) class.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 01:39 AM   #9
Bellman
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
Default

I would prefer initialy more balance in the gameplay by introducing Russian/Chinese equvalents to the current platforms.
__________________

Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
Bellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 01:40 AM   #10
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

in saying western SSK what about the german 212 / 214 ?
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 05:40 AM   #11
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,645
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitain
in saying western SSK what about the german 212 / 214 ?
Yep. Probably the most silent subs in service today.

Else: give me a carrier!

serious: a russian equivalent to the sim's frigate, helo, recce plane would be politically correct. But I personally would welcome sub stuff more than any surface or flying things - these simply do not catch my interest.

But I do not even guess about addons. These will take many years to realize, judging by the ridiculously slow pace at which they do their patch - which goes first of any addons. Fix what is there before mess it up again by adding new things.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 06:19 AM   #12
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Demon
But since we only get one vote....I gotta say Arleigh Burke.
I know... I'd love to see them all. I'm not particularly worried about Western D/E boats being playable, though. Maybe that's just because of my specific interests.

Something I'm curious nobody brought up:

What about an Ohio SSGN?
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 07:25 AM   #13
Fish
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

For multiplay, Russian/Chinees equivalent of the FFG,MH-60 and P3, unquestionably!
And some AI Dutch ships, sub.
Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 07:28 AM   #14
Molon Labe
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitain
in saying western SSK what about the german 212 / 214 ?
Yep. Probably the most silent subs in service today.

Else: give me a carrier!

serious: a russian equivalent to the sim's frigate, helo, recce plane would be politically correct. But I personally would welcome sub stuff more than any surface or flying things - these simply do not catch my interest.

But I do not even guess about addons. These will take many years to realize, judging by the ridiculously slow pace at which they do their patch - which goes first of any addons. Fix what is there before mess it up again by adding new things.
Rounding out the ASW battlespace has nothing to do with political correctness. It's about finishing what was started. Right now, we have a choice of platforms that allows sub v. sub games and Russian/Chinese sub v. US ASW. Adding the counterparts to the new playables gets US subs v Russian ASW in. Being able to turn things around makes for a much better game.

Currently, surface and air warfare are crudely modeled, but the ASW battlespace is close to where it needs to be. It's just more efficient for SCS to finish the ASW component of the game before hitting the surface and air warfare hard. DW (or possibly its sequel) is an evolutionary project which will eventually fully integrate all battlespace into one game. It's not easy to do right, so skipping around is not going to produce as good a product as finishing the parts they started will.
Molon Labe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 08:19 AM   #15
OKO
Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Solar system, mainly on earth
Posts: 476
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish
For multiplay, Russian/Chinees equivalent of the FFG,MH-60 and P3, unquestionably!
And some AI Dutch ships, sub.

I definitly agree with that.
OKO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.