|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: What platform do you want to see as the next playable in DW? | |||
| Arleigh Burke IIA-class |
   
|
29 | 19.73% |
| Virginia-class |
  
|
25 | 17.01% |
| Sierra III-class |
  
|
3 | 2.04% |
| Alfa-class |
  
|
10 | 6.80% |
| Sovremenny-class |
  
|
10 | 6.80% |
| Udaloy II-class |
  
|
33 | 22.45% |
| Ticonderoga III/IV-class |
|
15 | 10.20% |
| Other |
|
22 | 14.97% |
| Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-05, 08:47 PM
|
#2 |
|
Silent Hunter
 Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
The priority really ought to be to add the Russian/Chinese equivalents of the American ASW platforms that DW added to SC, or, by the same logic, a Western diesel-electric. This would round-out the ASW battlespace, which is rather incomplete without the counterparts being in the game.
After that, expanding the game into a better surface and air warfare makes sense. That would be the time to start adding more multirole surface vessles. :|\ |
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode