SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SHIII Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-10, 09:41 PM   #1
Madox58
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The search/spot is hard coded into the dat for the K-Ship.


I wanted it to have a narrow beam/activation that standard
search lites could not handle.

The fact that no one has ever reported them seen?
Tells me it works as designed!
(It must fly over you at less then 250 feet or so?)

But it is a clue to further modify other Search lite settings.
Also in the K-Ship.
The Guy up front with binos?
He will turn and look at enemy Units.
(Another Easter Egg Alert!)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 05:24 AM   #2
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,539
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schlechter pfennig View Post
Think we can keep that one then!

I'm having a devil of a time finding the folders for the following:
F01B=Steam Trawler 01
F02B=Steam Trawler 02
F03B=Steam Trawler 03
F04B=Steam Trawler 04
LTgBoat=Tugboat
PCTrawler=ASW Trawler
TugBoat=Tugboat

Help?
I've responded to your PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by privateer View Post
The search/spot is hard coded into the dat for the K-Ship.


I wanted it to have a narrow beam/activation that standard
search lites could not handle.

The fact that no one has ever reported them seen?
Tells me it works as designed!
(It must fly over you at less then 250 feet or so?)

But it is a clue to further modify other Search lite settings.
Also in the K-Ship.
The Guy up front with binos?
He will turn and look at enemy Units.
(Another Easter Egg Alert!)
LMAO
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 06:40 AM   #3
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

LTgBoat=Tugboat - NLTF
PCTrawler=ASW Trawler - NTRW
TugBoat=Tugboat - NATF

And IIRC didnt BBs carry searchlights and cruisers come to that
Will have to check on that
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 07:58 AM   #4
schlechter pfennig
Commander
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 462
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboywooly View Post
LTgBoat=Tugboat - NLTF
PCTrawler=ASW Trawler - NTRW
TugBoat=Tugboat - NATF

And IIRC didnt BBs carry searchlights and cruisers come to that
Will have to check on that
Please do! If they historically did I'll just add them back in.
schlechter pfennig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 09:18 AM   #5
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

Well have come acroos a pic from 1893 on a BB
lol
And one in WW1
This
http://cgi.ebay.com/Battleship-Searc...-/120079796732
Is a 1940s US postcard

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...p-Thread/page4 shows lights on more than a few so yeah leave the BBs

HMS Hood

Quote:
Searchlights
As Completed (1920) 8x 36" Searchlights
- x4 on Searchlight Platform between funnels
- x2 on After Searchlight Platform
- x2 on platform on foremast 4x 24" signaling searchlights on Admiral's Bridge


July 1921 Refit
2x 36" searchlights removed from Searchlight Platform between funnels


September-November 1923 Refit
2x 36" searchlights replaced (as above)


October-December 1924 Refit
2x 36" searchlights once again removed (as above)


November 1925 - July 1926 Refit
Searchlights on After Concentrating Position moved abreast each other
2x 24" signaling searchlights removed


June - October 1936 Refit
36" searchlight platform removed from foremast


Feb-August 1939 Refit
4x 40" searchlights added, one on either side of After Concentrating Position and one either side just aft of number two funnel
2x 24" Signaling light added on bridge
Replacement of 36" searchlights and removal of the platform between the funnels.


Final Outfit (As Sunk)
6 x 40" searchlights (2 just aft of second funnel and 4 on the After Concentrating Position)
4x 24" signaling searchlight
http://www.hmshood.com/ship/hoodspecs5.htm

Cruisers too - well US ones deffo

Quote:
The cruiser group attacked first, with De Ruyter in the lead, followed by Java, Piet Hein, Ford, and Pope in the order named. Arrival off the south coast of Bali took place as scheduled at about 2130 on the 19th. An hour later the action began. The cruisers searchlights illuminated two enemy vessels off the port bow, and firing from the gun batteries began at once
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/...avaSea-12.html

Quote:
USS Indianapolis (CA 35) - Closeup view of her after half, from the port side, at the Mare Island Navy Yard, 19 April 1942, following overhaul. Note her SOC seaplanes, 5"/25 guns and ready service ammunition, after smokestack, searchlights, "horse" collar emergency life float alongside the railing in lower right center and top edge of armor belt. USS Raleigh (CL 7) is in the background.
http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/035/04035.htm
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 10:59 AM   #6
h.sie
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,192
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0


Default

i think the question is not wheather battleships historically had searchlights. in my opinion, the question is: if they had lights, did they use the lights when near a uboat / in alarm state?

if in sh3 a ship has searchlights in .eqp file; it will use the lights when in alarm state.

but maybe in the WWII battleships have lights but only for night surface battles and not for hunting uboats???

if so, it would be historically more accurate to remove the lights in sh3 because it's not a surface battle simulator. Otherwise battleships would be lighted up like a christmas tree - an easy target for uboats.

i think that is what Sailor Steve said in a different thread.
__________________
My Mediafire page: http://www.mediafire.com/hsie
h.sie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-10, 11:02 AM   #7
schlechter pfennig
Commander
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 462
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h.sie View Post
i think the question is not wheather battleships historically had searchlights. in my opinion, the question is: if they had lights, did they use the lights when near a uboat / in alarm state?

if in sh3 a ship has searchlights in .eqp file; it will use the lights when in alarm state.

but maybe in the WWII battleships have lights but only for night surface battles and not for hunting uboats.

if so, it would be historically more accurate to remove the lights in sh3 because it's not a surface battle simulator and battleships would be lighted up like a christmas tree - an easy target for uboats.

i think that is what Sailor Steve said in a different thread.
::nods:: One of (the many) little quirky-irks about SHIII: all or nothing.

In this case (searchlights) it's not so much a matter of whether they were equipped with them as much as it is when they would have used them.

Unless I get really negative feedback, I think, after consideration, I'm going to stay with the choices as I'd already listed.
schlechter pfennig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.