Noah's Ark found...

tater · 04-28-10, 12:34 PM

Heheh, true.

What is funny is that these so-called archeologists were even looking at 13,000 feet. As I posted above, even if you assume there was some sort of actual, historical event that would be called a "flood" by the illiterate locals of the time in that region (asia minor, eastern med, middle east)—you need to at least assume a REASONABLE event. A plausible event. Heck, all the polar ice melting while unlikely, is at least POSSIBLE. So add 30 million km^3 water to the earth, then calculate about where the sea level rises to.

Works out to 50-60 meters. Melting every ounce of ice on earth.

Looking above 50-60 meters is absurd. Any result above that is made up. And that sort of flood still assumes a radical event (and doesn't make it rain).

That sort of rise also gives lie to the notion of god exterminating everything, since it clearly would not have resulted in that, so even if such a historical flood of that extreme level—and certainly anything lesser—gives lie to the claimed plan of god in the whole thing.

The flood needs to be as deep as the mountains or sinners are left alive, and god is all powerful, so it MUST be that deep. There is no way (or evidence) of such a deep flood to have happened. Looking for proof is asking to look the fool.

04-28-10, 12:34 PM	#38
tater Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 9,023 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 2	Heheh, true. What is funny is that these so-called archeologists were even looking at 13,000 feet. As I posted above, even if you assume there was some sort of actual, historical event that would be called a "flood" by the illiterate locals of the time in that region (asia minor, eastern med, middle east)—you need to at least assume a REASONABLE event. A plausible event. Heck, all the polar ice melting while unlikely, is at least POSSIBLE. So add 30 million km^3 water to the earth, then calculate about where the sea level rises to. Works out to 50-60 meters. Melting every ounce of ice on earth. Looking above 50-60 meters is absurd. Any result above that is made up. And that sort of flood still assumes a radical event (and doesn't make it rain). That sort of rise also gives lie to the notion of god exterminating everything, since it clearly would not have resulted in that, so even if such a historical flood of that extreme level—and certainly anything lesser—gives lie to the claimed plan of god in the whole thing. The flood needs to be as deep as the mountains or sinners are left alive, and god is all powerful, so it MUST be that deep. There is no way (or evidence) of such a deep flood to have happened. Looking for proof is asking to look the fool.