Thanks for al the fish!

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by pythos

Now, looking at what Neal has said, I want you to point to me where it says discussion of the EFFECTS OF a crack is prohibited. The Cnet article was about the EFFECT not the crack itself.

To reiterate:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

You may not like the rule. You may disagree with the rule. You may have a great argument against the rule. But none of that matters, as it's Neal's rule. If you have an issue with it, take it up with him. Don't publicly call out moderators for enforcing the rules of the site. That alone would be enough to earn you a ban in many internet forums.

You don't go making threads publicly calling out a moderator's decision on a subject that's very touchy. If you truly had an issue with a decision that you thought was legitimate, you send a PM. You don't buck the system in front of God and everybody in a thread that's nothing but an attention grab, as kylania pointed out. That's rude and disrespectful of the moderators who put up with too much crap in this forum as it is.