SH5 patch #2 - Page 2

mcarlsonus · 03-30-10, 12:38 PM

guess I wonder why Ubi couldn't have postponed the original release by a month or so to address these issues BEFORE they put it on the market...

Like they didn't know from their beta testers that the AI sucked (Kiel) canal water, for example? Like no one else plotted a course in the mission assignment map, only to find it gone when starting the actual mission?

BUT, of course, Ubi should be forgiven for EVERYTHING ! After all, the NEW definition of Subsim modders is, "Those who not only enhance the gameplaying experience, but (...new part coming up...) make an unplayable, unenjoyable prematurely-released game acceptable - at NO COST to Ubi - but you, the buyer, are STILL expected to pay Ubi for the privilege!"

03-30-10, 12:38 PM	#10
mcarlsonus Weps Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 362 Downloads: 13 Uploads: 0	guess I wonder why Ubi couldn't have postponed the original release by a month or so to address these issues BEFORE they put it on the market... Like they didn't know from their beta testers that the AI sucked (Kiel) canal water, for example? Like no one else plotted a course in the mission assignment map, only to find it gone when starting the actual mission? BUT, of course, Ubi should be forgiven for EVERYTHING ! After all, the NEW definition of Subsim modders is, "Those who not only enhance the gameplaying experience, but (...new part coming up...) make an unplayable, unenjoyable prematurely-released game acceptable - at NO COST to Ubi - but you, the buyer, are STILL expected to pay Ubi for the privilege!"