All I Need to be Happy - Page 2

Hanomag · 03-26-10, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brag

Yup, if Ubi would hajust improved the SHIII graphis SHIIIB would be a hot seller.

The secret of a good business is build on success

I second that.... I would have been happy with SH3 2.a .. but I guess they cant do that...

Nisgeis · 03-26-10, 04:45 PM

Which would have been better, SH3 2.a or SHIIIB?

Sailor Steve · 03-26-10, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brag

To be happy, all I need is SHIII with GWX and SHV water

Not enough. SH3 lacked gameplay functions that still can't be fixed. Some parts of SH4 are better - much better. But I agree that the ideal should be to take what's best from what you have, fix what's broken, and build on that. Cool stuff can be added to a game that's functioning well; one that's not can't be replaced with another that's not.

Hanomag · 03-26-10, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nisgeis

Which would have been better, SH3 2.a or SHIIIB?

LOL

bigboywooly · 03-26-10, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

fix what's broken, and build on that. .

Or in SH5s case broke whats already working
Agreed the game has huge potential
Immersive factor is missing big time
Only so many times I wanna ask the tool in the radio room how is brother is doing on the Bismark ( In 1940 they were off on a secret mission to hunt American cruisers

)
When is my hydraphone op gonna give me a sound I chase that only turns out to be a fishing vessel ? or a neutral cargo ship ?
When is my crew going to spot a convoy ? instead of a taskforce every time
The ability to pick any year as a start date - esp for testing instead of having to start a new career every time you make a campaign change to see it and having to TC all the way to the year you want to look at

A lot that was good and worked in SH3 has dissappeared to be replaced by some lame stuff and cool additions too

I think what Brag and others wanted are the eye candy and additions ( new engine,dynamic campaign etc ) built on top of SH3 so you included all that was great about SH3 plus all that is good with SH5

Nordmann · 03-26-10, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

I think what Brag and others wanted are the eye candy and additions ( new engine,dynamic campaign etc ) built on top of SH3 so you included all that was great about SH3 plus all that is good with SH5

Now that would really have been something. Sadly, the reality is always different.

The Enigma · 03-26-10, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat

I thought SH5 was SHIIIB...

Does the B in SHIIIB stand for Beta?

Nisgeis · 03-26-10, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Enigma

Does the B in SHIIIB stand for Beta?

Nope, it stands for Bernaaaard!!!

Adriatico · 03-26-10, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thyro

Pardon me to differ. But I actually see SH4's water graphics (modded) same or even better than SH5 graphics managed to deliver.

Also... many people think that torpedo explosion&splash graphics of SH5 are simply bad.
Far from excelent...

Nordmann · 03-26-10, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nisgeis

Nope, it stand for Bernaaaard!!!

Ubisoft is pleased to announce, Silent Hunter 6: BERNAAAARRD!

THE_MASK · 03-26-10, 06:11 PM

Quote "First they will love us, then they will hate us (with reason) then after patches & mods it will be the only sub sim worth playing. " SH3 + GWX will soon be toast.

03-26-10, 04:45 PM	#17
Nisgeis Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 2,909 Downloads: 77 Uploads: 11	Which would have been better, SH3 2.a or SHIIIB? __________________ -------------------------------- This space left intentionally blank.

03-26-10, 06:11 PM	#26
THE_MASK Ace of the deep . Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 9,226 Downloads: 901 Uploads: 73	Quote "First they will love us, then they will hate us (with reason) then after patches & mods it will be the only sub sim worth playing. " SH3 + GWX will soon be toast.