![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Now what may happen is this : there will be no more AAA graphics intense subsims. But this is different from saying that the subsim genre is dead in the water. Think about it, going from SH3 to SH 5 what has been acomplished ? More graphics yes of course. And then what else ? The real improvements are nowhere to be seen because Ubisoft never cared for in the first place. And no what I'm thinking of can never be achieved by simply modding SH 5. Cheer up, people are still playing CFS2 and Fs9. Subsimers will have to make do with what they have. Sh3, 4 and 5. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 259
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The more we wait, the cheaper SH5 will get + more patches/mods!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
Sub Command made by Sonalysts was a submarine simulator, Ubi's Silent Hunter series is not. SH III and 4 had some simulator elements, SH5 have very few, so SH5 it's obvious not a submarine simulator. I really don't know why people are talking about SH5 as a submarine simulator, even Ubi does not see the game as a simulator, as you probably know that. But many of you really WANT to see it that way, the way that it isn't. Last edited by Gunnodayak; 03-26-10 at 06:44 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ayr,Scotland,UK
Posts: 1,392
Downloads: 79
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
As was Dangerous Waters, but I don't see Sonalysts breaking their neck to make another do you? And neither is any other game company. Why bother when you can make a cute puppy dog game with a third as many devs in a third of the time and sell ten times more copies?
And much as I admire DFTD and all other indie developments they are still along way from being comparable to the SH series. Only Jutland & Distant Guns are cohesive and complete enough to be on the same level and they are truly wargames rather than first person simulations. The real problem is that companies like EA & Ubi (not the devs but the suits) have stopped listening to their customers and in the economic downturn are focussed on delivering "value" to their shareholders rather than quality product to their customers, big mistake.
__________________
"The action is simulated...the excitement is real!" Microprose Simulation Software. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
And DFTD is not developing the way it should mainly just because of our LACK of interest. Personally, I would be glad to pay money for their game, and not 50 Euros, but 100, even if it's open source now, just because it's a more healthy project, a cleaner one. Even if it's just in development stage for such a long time. I would like to have a submarine simulation game that I will be able to play for years, and one that should be playable. Last edited by Gunnodayak; 03-26-10 at 07:11 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ayr,Scotland,UK
Posts: 1,392
Downloads: 79
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
What we are ending up with now are "toolkits" half finished games with large modding potential but whether they live or die is up to us, not the way it should be but sadly the way it is.
__________________
"The action is simulated...the excitement is real!" Microprose Simulation Software. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
On the one hand, it contains many true sim improvements the community has wanted for a long time: full 3d interior, wolfpacks, U-tankers, enemy subs, better moddability, scripting, better mission editor. It has many under the hood tweaks: AI scripts, apparently better underwater sonar modelling, underwater drag, etc. All of these elements have the potential (with a lot of TLC) to turn SH5 into a great sub sim. On the other hand, it contains a crew management/RPG model which appears to have been tacked on and obviously does not belong in a subsim. You can sense a war between the people at Ubisoft who really want to make a sim and those who just want to dump the project and move on to more profitable projects they can sell on consoles. Its obviously the non-sim execs who came up with the idea of trying to turn it into a RPG clone that could appeal to a more casual crowd. The result is the worst case scenario we see now: SH5 is rejected by the casual gamers and the subsim community, reviews are poor, sales are poor, the game is dumped on the market. The next step is for Ubisoft to shut down the franchise and exit the sim market. As for someone else coming into the market and producing a new subsim, I personally don't see it. The market fo sims is small and the biggest market share is in flight sims followed by land combat sims. The market for subsims is very small. None of the existing small developpers have the interest to develop naval war sims or even the capacity to produce something as good as SH5 is in its current state without a major investment.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Bilge_Rat; 03-26-10 at 08:17 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Periscope depth
Posts: 860
Downloads: 119
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
After that, if Ubi doesn't care what they serve to community why should we care more ? ...more than Ubi itself. If your partner doesn't like you any more - ask yourself what have you done to him.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
Or a different game development company entering the arena perhaps? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 325
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
SH series is most played subsim in last few years because its the only one there is, and the dynamic campaign offers replayability.
There is no competition to SH so its a no brainer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
This subsim community is a force in some way, it has a lot of dedicated players, and more than this, modders! And all this force that is not being aware of its own force as an entity is being put to "work" for Ubi. I am not talking about the great things they have accomplished for us, they really did that big time, but also, we are somehow a sustaining force for Ubi, and this is manipulation, since Ubi doesn't treat us with respect. It's somehow manipulated in some way, just because the subsim community is not really aware of its force. And this is the moment Neal should act accordingly, as the leader of this community. What is happening now is not fair, in my opinion. It's not good at all, maybe we should start to see things clearer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
agreed.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 259
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Don't be naive, there won't be such thing as "our subsim". A couple of months ago I've tried to draw some attention and support to the open source project Danger From The Deep (which is still in development mainly because the lack of real support), but with no success, so it's seems that for the majority of the people here Ubi products are just right. Instead of investing so much energy speaking about the crappy and unplayable SH5, it would have been much more constructive to act somehow, to support Danger From The Deep. Like in real life, we are having what we deserve, nothing more and nothing less!
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|