Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicolas
Yeah. I know. But what i can do to it?
|

Your quote looks to be taken directly from Wikipedia. Further down the same page, Wiki also says (about the word "hack"):
Quote:
The term has since acquired an additional and now more common meaning, since approximately the 1980s; this more modern definition was initially associated with crackers. This growing use of the term "hack" is to refer to a program that (sometimes illegally) modifies another program, often a computer game, giving the user access to features otherwise inaccessible to them.
|
... and also:
Quote:
Companies take different attitudes towards such practices, ranging from open acceptance (such as Texas Instruments for its graphing calculators and Lego for its Lego Mindstorms robotics gear) to outright hostility (such as Microsoft's attempts to lock out Xbox hackers or the DRM routines on Blu-ray Disc players designed to sabotage compromised players).
|

But Wikipedia has
this to say about the word "patch":
Quote:
Programmers publish and apply patches in various forms. Because proprietary software authors withhold their source code, their patches are distributed as binary executables instead of source. This type of patch modifies the program executable—the program the user actually runs—either by modifying the binary file to include the fixes or by completely replacing it.
|
So, you be the judge ... it's your mod. Which definition does it best fit?