SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-10, 01:36 PM   #1
ddrgn
Korvettenkapitän
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 918
Downloads: 362
Uploads: 30
Default

I got rammed and notice no difference from SH4
ddrgn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 01:54 PM   #2
Webster
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrgn View Post
I got rammed and notice no difference from SH4

oh well, im not surprised if this wasnt corrected


both the DD and the sub should get badly damaged in a collision


too often people think the DD shouldnt sink but thats not reality, ramming a sub was in fact likely to sink the destroyer or at least cause significant flooding because they were designed for speed and not as a battering ram
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:06 PM   #3
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webster View Post
ramming a sub was in fact likely to sink the destroyer or at least cause significant flooding
Got anything to back that up?

Ramming subs was very common in the reports on uboat.net, but no sinkings are listed for the DDs.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:07 PM   #4
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Ramming was indeed a common and extremely deadly practice. SHIV+OM is the only place where I've seen the ramming effects work correctly...
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:13 PM   #5
longam
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,014
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

Have to agree, running aground on a reef can tear open your hull, so a steel hull sub would be worse.
longam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:15 PM   #6
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longam View Post
Have to agree, running aground on a reef can tear open your hull, so a steel hull sub would be worse.
Ramming a sub and floundering on a reef are very, very different
experiences for a DD's hull.

I have never heard of a DD taking serious damage from ramming a ubat.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 07:10 PM   #7
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum View Post
Ramming a sub and floundering on a reef are very, very different
experiences for a DD's hull.

I have never heard of a DD taking serious damage from ramming a ubat.
Donald MacIntyre (the man who captured Otto Kretschmer), in his book U-Boat Killer, does tell the story of one destroyer who rammed a u-boat at full speed, ran completely over it and ripped both propellors off. But no, it didn't sink, and I don't recall reading of any destroyer that sank after ramming a submarine either, except for USS Borie. In that case the two ships were locked together after the ramming, in a raging storm. They also fought a duel with small arms at close range. U-405 finally sank, and then Borie sank the next day.
http://www.destroyerhistory.org/flus...rie/index.html

But that was a rare case, not the norm. Destroyers almost never sink after a ramming. Part of the reason is the extreme compartmentation of a surface warship. They are designed to float even after losing the bow in a storm, and there was one British destroyer that survived having both bow and stern blown off by torpedoes.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:18 PM   #8
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

But reefs aren't 1" thick and filled with a lot of athmospheric-pressure air and meat, are they. Nor would reefs be pushed under water if something run over them. Nor are subs made of solid rock

There's no question that ramming would damage the attacker, but it was most definitely considered a worthy risk. The end result would normally be a crumpled bow, but not a sinking.

Nor was the outcome always fatal for the boat.

See this one:
http://www.uboat.net/allies/merchants/ships/2236.html
Quote:
On 6 Oct, 1942, U-333 fought an epic battle with HMS Crocus (K 49) about 60 miles southwest of Freetown. The U-boat was rammed twice and a gun duel was fought out on close distance. Both vessels suffered damage and sustained casualties. The boat lost three men dead (including the IWO) and several men wounded, including the commander. U-333 was heavily damaged and limped back to base with help from a replacement WO from the Milk Cow U-459. Cremer then spent three months in a hospital.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-10, 06:26 PM   #9
longam
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,014
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

Yes it would all depend on mass. If the object you strike would have more mass then your vessel, more damage would happen. It's like having a collision with an iceberg twice the mass of your ship, that would rip your hull!

So a u-boat would definitively be less weight then a destroyer, and I could see riding up over it because of the pressure hull design. I would just hope your propulsion would survive.
longam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 11:23 AM   #10
kaa13
Nub
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 0
Default

http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-66.htm
kaa13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 11:30 AM   #11
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

The biggest problem for the u-boat is the pressure hull. No matter that it's thicker and tougher than the thin hull plates of a destroyer, 1200-to-2400 tons of ship making 12 knots or better has a fair chance of rupturing the pressure hull, and once that happens the u-boat is no longer a submarine - it's now a very big torpedo boat with only one cannon vs four or five.

Problem two is that the sub is at that point attempting to get crew out on deck to fight or get them below to dive. The hatches are open. No matter where the boat is struck, if it rolls over enough to get the bridge underwater even for a moment, the ocean is now running down the hatches and inside the sub. Bad news there.

In any case, it's always bad for a submarine to be rammed by a surface ship.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.