The whole game = epic fail?

[karamazovnew]

Originally Posted by SubV

I think that most of us expected SH5 to be a modern version of SH3, with updated graphics, better interface and no major bugs.

Damn you, Ubisoft [Romania]. You never learned anything from your mistakes.

No major bugs yet. Compared with the Save-game fiasco of SH3 and the legendary A key of SH4, that's a big plus.
From what I see, SH5 really IS a modern version of SH3. It has the same flaws . What did you expect? SH5=SH3+GWX+OLC+othermods? The only minuses (apart from 43 and type 7 only) so far are the values for ships in the recognition manual (easy to mod in) and the depth under keel.

The modding possibilities and improved graphics AND free-roam capability totally outweigh the POS thing.

What we SHOULD do, instead of bashing the game, is spam the devs for badly needed EASY features for the patches.

[urfisch]

you are right. we not should bash the game...but set up some intense discussion about the actual state and how this might be changed instantly!!! nothing else was intended by me with this provoking thread title...

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by karamazovnew

and the legendary A key of SH4,

That was my "quit to desktop" hotkey. It was a FEATURE, not a bug!

[makman94]

if the engine of the game works ok then all other things is a matter of time to be 'fixed'
BUT the main question is this : is this a simulation engine? is anything modeled in game's engine ? physics...AI behaviour (random....? ''clever''...?)....eh...xm...manual targeting (with no contacts on map), properly...working sensors ....and what about weather ? is now working ?
if all these are not modelled at all or correct in game's engine...don't ever expect to see it as a sub simulation ( this doesn't mean that any of the previous versions was ever a sub simulation)