[QUE] Boycott / mass dynamic things not allowed?

[AOTD_MadMax]

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens

I hope if there ever is an SH6 (doubtful), they will not neglect the great resource of this community like they did this time.

Hmmm you will see, they are blind like worms.............
It is an illusion to think that Ubi keeps an eye on things that happend here.
We only can get them on the financial terrain cause thats the first reason why Ubi works out any game.

If we wanne change something we have to work out an commercial strategic concept that they can follow.
The first point in a conceptline of an new SH-Game is, "how we can sell more units".
There we have to interact.
If we are able to create an good logical concept that Ubi shows that this concept will bring them more money, maybe they will open up the ears.

Thats the only way.........

Sorry for my poor english.

Regards

AOTD|MadMax

[Carotio]

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens

I did not see a single person in Copenhagen tell Mike, Mihai, or Dan that they suck, they didn't know what they were doing, etc. Why would we want to do it here?

I don't think anyone of us points our ranting at the devs. I mean, I was one of the lucky ones to meet them, talk to them and I got the feeling that they are as much passionate about the game as much as we are. But I also got the impression that they were on a tight schedule and that they had to decide which parts could make it in before the release and which couldn't.

I don't blame any of the devs. If the Ubi management gave them 1 more year, I'm sure there would be all types and the full war. I'm also sure that if the devs were to decide, they would probably choose another solution than this DRM.
As I wrote somewhere else: I just don't understand why the people in charge don't choose the Windows activation process solution instead. Let the users play the game as they wish, but within the first 30 days, it must be activated ONCE. It would make it much more acceptable for anyone, I would think.

Originally Posted by Carotio

I just don't understand why the people in charge don't choose the Windows activation process solution instead. Let the users play the game as they wish, but within the first 30 days, it must be activated ONCE. It would make it much more acceptable for anyone, I would think.

i agree and go one better, when updating windows validates the install by rechecking the registration and this too can be a good model to follow where the game validates on startup then goes offline unless your in multiplayer.

i see no reason (related to the game) for it to stay online the whole time