SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: SH5 - One or more playable subs? (see definition first!)
I'm fine with a single playable Sub 49 22.58%
I'd prefer several playable Subs 168 77.42%
Voters: 217. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-10, 09:37 AM   #1
MH
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,184
Downloads: 248
Uploads: 0
Default

One detailed sub instead of few scetchy ones that play almost the same...
MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 10:43 AM   #2
Turbografx
Old Stormalong
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Gret Stet of Loosiana
Posts: 232
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default

As you describe it, one detailed sub would suit me better. However, I know that sub would be a VII and I love me some II...
Turbografx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 10:53 AM   #3
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Several.

I disagree with Danlisa that having only one makes it an FPS game, but I also disagree with The General that having several makes it an arcade game.

Having only one can make it a true simulator, but only if everything on the boat is accurately represented and works exactly as the real thing did, and even then a true simulator would require 'hands-on' capability, which in turn would require a real u-boat interior to walk around in, and I mean really walk around in, not pretend to with a computer screen.

On the other hand, having all boats playable allows us to simulate a believable career, with all the variables that come with being forced to put to sea in an older training boat and hoping to be given a real ocean-going submarine before we retire.

Aces Of the Deep had all four major types, and for all its limitations was much more sim than arcade game. The same was true of Silent Hunter. As with SH3 and SH4, for all the complaints made about the last one. It may have it's faults, but arcade shooter it most definitely is not. Only SH2 comes close to being an FPS, with its 'level' one had to pass to go on to the next one.

Back when SH3 was in development someone said that he didn't need the 3D view and the 3D crew - he would be happy with AOD's gameplay and SH2's graphics. I have quoted that line several times in the six years since then, and I'd be happy with SH4 if everything worked properly. SH5 looks cool, but that wish still stands.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 11:01 AM   #4
danlisa
Navy Seal
 
danlisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 5,499
Downloads: 45
Uploads: 1
Default

Sorry SS but I can't justify SH5 as a Simulation if it doesn't accurately depict the U-Boat War. To do that, surely, it must include all the operational U-Boat types and theaters of operation?

Then again, that raises an interesting question! Was the SH series designed to be a U-Boat Simulation (as in vessel) or a U-Boat War Simulation? Is SH5 a departure from the latter?

Edit - Perhaps I've been spoilt by the community campaign scripting so much that I only remember the historical realism of the actual conflict rather than the control of the vessel in question.
__________________
danlisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 11:07 AM   #5
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

True, and put that way I do agree. I want them all, as I like imagining I'm a captain sailing the high seas. I don't want to tweak every button and pull every knob. My captain never did that. I did, and I hated it.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 11:00 AM   #6
Alex
Dominant Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,143
Downloads: 30
Uploads: 0
Default

SH being a niche game and not evolving within the same category as FSX , maybe we'll have a chance to see some UK subs or italian subs add-on released later, but I don't think we'll ever see one featuring a single U-Boot type.
Also, do not forget that Type II, IX and XXI as well as the type VII definitely were all part of what's called the Battle of the Atlantic. For that reason I can't even imagine stock SH5 not including all of them U-Boote types.

I don't think it would be fair to script operation Paukenschlag in SH5 with the type VII as only playable unit available, forcing the player to refuel from a Milchkuh in the middle of the ocean before reaching the american east coast.
__________________
Alex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 11:16 AM   #7
danurve
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,481
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
..
Also, do not forget that Type II, IX and XXI as well as the type VII definitely were all part of what's called the Battle of the Atlantic. ..
I can't agree with that unless it's considered that the XXI helped to loose the Battle of the Atlantic. That's right, in the end all it did was consume resources to no avail. On the other hand if they scrapped the entire IX series for the XXI .. another useless debate though.

Back to the poll; had to vote for multiple subs. Even though I'd get the game if it was only a type VII. Seeing how it's the best sub to work with.

But come on, does anyone realy think the game will be limited like that?
I call BS.
__________________
danurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-10, 11:50 AM   #8
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,818
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Several, Tpes II, VII, IX, XXI.........and XXIII.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.