SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: Compulsary Minimum Pass Rate To Be Authorised For Command
Yes, Should be minimum pass rate, in order for command 46 44.66%
no, not intrested to earn my right for command 58 56.31%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-09, 12:46 AM   #1
rik007
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 785
Downloads: 122
Uploads: 0
Default

No. I'm a veteran already. When you reinstall the game or when you have multiple installs you have to do it al over again which is boring.
rik007 is offline  
Old 12-14-09, 01:00 AM   #2
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,726
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default

I voted yes... but yes and no is how i really feel.

Yes because - if people would take their time to use the training missions to gain a fair level of proficiency and competency they would find themselves more successful on actual patrol.

No because - you can alienate a lot of casual gamers by doing it this way.

I think that if you set your realism settings above 90%, then you should have to go through the U-boat training missions and there would be a minimum pass rate on each mission. and a minimum total pass rate (so you could perform poorly on one or more sessions but still pass.)

for ultimate realism, you would be assigned to a port and a sub type based on your overall performance.

in other words

If minimum passing is 70% and you scored...

70-80% you would be assigned to a Type II until you proved yourself in combat and earned the ability to transfer to a new boat.

81%-90% you would be assigned to a VII

91%-100% you could choose your own command and base.

just something to think about... i think you could implement it into the career mode without ruffling feathers.

but like i said, forcing a player to complete training missions to a certain degree of proficiency is only going to alienate more casual players.
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline  
Old 12-14-09, 01:43 AM   #3
Méo
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,153
Downloads: 258
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenRivet View Post
70-80% you would be assigned to a Type II until you proved yourself in combat and earned the ability to transfer to a new boat.

81%-90% you would be assigned to a VII

91%-100% you could choose your own command and base.
I really like the idea.

It would be worth to put a real effort in it.

This idea paired with the fact that your crew's morale will be based on your actions would be great.

It would add more sense to give everything you got, the best you do, the higher your crew's morale will be and the more choice you would have in boats types & flotilla.

Let's just hope they see it or hope they thought about it before you.

Last edited by Méo; 12-14-09 at 03:11 AM.
Méo is offline  
Old 12-14-09, 01:49 AM   #4
Webster
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

i'm in the yes and no mind set, no it shouldnt be required for you to get a command but yes it should determine if you get the worst boat in the fleet or a sub in good shape based on your skill and proficiency level that shows you earned the right to be trusted with a good boat
 
Old 12-14-09, 01:50 AM   #5
THE_MASK
Ace of the deep .
 
THE_MASK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,226
Downloads: 901
Uploads: 73


Default

Make it an option .
THE_MASK is offline  
Old 12-14-09, 02:40 AM   #6
karamazovnew
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,403
Downloads: 151
Uploads: 0


Default

A simple "Since this is your first ever career, do you want to start with the training misions?" dialog box should be enough. Although I hope that this time they will be better documented and more fun. The ones in all major mods were a blast.
karamazovnew is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:41 AM   #7
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenRivet View Post
I voted yes... but yes and no is how i really feel.

Yes because - if people would take their time to use the training missions to gain a fair level of proficiency and competency they would find themselves more successful on actual patrol.

No because - you can alienate a lot of casual gamers by doing it this way.

I think that if you set your realism settings above 90%, then you should have to go through the U-boat training missions and there would be a minimum pass rate on each mission. and a minimum total pass rate (so you could perform poorly on one or more sessions but still pass.)

for ultimate realism, you would be assigned to a port and a sub type based on your overall performance.

in other words

If minimum passing is 70% and you scored...

70-80% you would be assigned to a Type II until you proved yourself in combat and earned the ability to transfer to a new boat.

81%-90% you would be assigned to a VII

91%-100% you could choose your own command and base.

just something to think about... i think you could implement it into the career mode without ruffling feathers.

but like i said, forcing a player to complete training missions to a certain degree of proficiency is only going to alienate more casual players.

I could read 2 pages of posts but, I think along yhe same lines as GR.

To have it locked is a game killer and would hurt sales.

At least until the crack came out.
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.