Realism v simulation

Bellman · 08-04-05, 08:25 PM

Rip - ''The baffle is less than 120 degrees''

How much less ? - lot of room down to our DW 60 deg.

Rip -''The depth change data is fairly accurate''

Which data - Greenville trans. or mine from 688 DW ?

Marconi - ''The depth change performance in DW isn't unrealistic, it's dreadful.''

You arent telling me surely that the 688 in DW taking a minute to level out over 20 ft is accurate ?
When the transcript shows the 688 takes '' a minute or so '' to go from 150 ft to Peri. depth !
One assumes that means arrive at periscope deployment depth level and ready to deploy the peri.

I dont think there can be much room for lack of knowledge -
''You would be suprised how much technical details these guys don't know.''

If these areas are 'sensitive' then I can understand and appreciate the need to 'muddy the waters'
and also the need to inaccurately simulate. But I cant imagine that these are such areas of concern.

08-04-05, 08:25 PM	#1
Bellman Sea Lord Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,945 Downloads: 220 Uploads: 0	Rip - ''The baffle is less than 120 degrees'' How much less ? - lot of room down to our DW 60 deg. Rip -''The depth change data is fairly accurate'' Which data - Greenville trans. or mine from 688 DW ? Marconi - ''The depth change performance in DW isn't unrealistic, it's dreadful.'' You arent telling me surely that the 688 in DW taking a minute to level out over 20 ft is accurate ? When the transcript shows the 688 takes '' a minute or so '' to go from 150 ft to Peri. depth ! One assumes that means arrive at periscope deployment depth level and ready to deploy the peri. I dont think there can be much room for lack of knowledge - ''You would be suprised how much technical details these guys don't know.'' If these areas are 'sensitive' then I can understand and appreciate the need to 'muddy the waters' and also the need to inaccurately simulate. But I cant imagine that these are such areas of concern.