![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 138
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Fascinating. What evidence is there that, in reality, the Russian AAW systems were superior to the AEGIS system?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Well the Soviet deployed the first Anti ballistic missile system during the cold war
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 146
Downloads: 183
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The modders have already announced that the Aegis system behavior will be improved. They say it is already implemented and will be released in version 1.1
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 146
Downloads: 183
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Modders have announced that AA systems of US ships have been improved, the new release (1.1) will include this change.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
The reason for Russian AAW being superior in stock DW and SC had nothing to do with RL, it was just that the US AEGIS ships only had two launcher entities (the VLSs) which could only engage one target at a time and at a range limited to 10nm. The Russians tended to have multiple SAM systems and multiple launcher entities for each system, so they could get a lot more missiles in the air at multiple targets a lot more quickly.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 138
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Take it easy Pillar? I was just curious, sheesh!
![]() Thanks for the info ML. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|