![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You know what is weird. I had no idea about that passing until a few mins before now. Oh well.
Sorry about the wall of text. Just needed to post lots of stuff out there. The deniers want us to believe that private industry can't cope when in fact it has proven time and again how adaptable it is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Private industry survives just fine... untill the federal goverment starts to intervene.
In the long run this bill will be a job killer not a job creator.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Ya a big yawn from me on that one. You see tech is moving on and if anyone cant reduce by 20 percent by a whopping 10 years they are just lazy. Ya all that child labor was keeping private industry alive until that darn fed gov came in and stopped that eh? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do. Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Mookie and Zach are correct here. Industry needs to be watched. Let's start with Love Canal and go from there:
http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/lovecanal/01.htm
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
The love canal event is nothing compared to whats going on in a lot of third and second world countries at this moment in time (or what went on in the past). Industry needs to be closely watched and regulated globally, and hit hard over the head when it's bad.
As for the topic, we shall see. I am reluctant to blindly accept new technology as being a miracle cure all. It has in the past often claimed that, and proven not to be so (or worse the exact opposite). I can see plenty of possibilities for disaster with the algae mentioned if its bio-engineered and gets loose. Our 'genius' is often greatly out done by our foolishness and arrogance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
Zachstar.... I want you to make sure your sitting down.
For once, we actually agree on something. At least, in the "big picture". Your absolutely right in that a catastrophic collapse would cause unimaginable damage to the ecology. A return to "simple living" would be anything but, because between that section of humanity that COULDN'T survive in such a situation, and the mass of "consumers" that nature would be forced to support in a MUCH less "ecological friendly" way that it does now, would devastate the environment as we know it. I also agree that we, as a country, should be leading the way in finding responsible ways to meet our needs while moving away from petroleum. The problem isn't your party, or any of the other parties. The problem is the POWER PEOPLE in the parties. Almost all of them are, in one way or the other, more inclined to keep the status quo, because that protects their personal power. Our electrical needs could be met easily with nuke power alone. In addition, a nuke plant is ideally suited to provide the power (and heat) necessary to produce hydrogen. One study indicated a modern nuke plant dedicated to hydrogen production would have an output equal to 400,000 gallons of gasoline - PER DAY! That's ONE plant.Move to hydrogen fuel cells for POV's and you have cut a huge amount of pollution out of our economy. Now, nuclear plants emit NO carbon - thats right, we are talking ZERO emissions here. However, they do have one drawback - the "waste". But there is an answer. Right now, when the fuel is "spent", its hauled to Yucca and buried - but the bugger is that the fuel still has 95% of its energy UNUSED! This is bad for the environment because your storing this crud in the earth, not to mention you are creating waste when you should be using as much of that stored energy as you can! Dr. Claudio Filippone has already developed and demonstrated how his project - called CAESAR (or Clean And Environmentally Safe Advanced Reactor) can create "ultra-spent" remnants from regular (non-enriched) Uranium while creating electricity. This solves the problem of "breeder" reactors which create weapons grade waste and thus are huge problems. Existing reactors need ENRICHED uranium - which then creates proliferation problems. CAESAR uses non-enriched fuel (once started) so its resultant "leftovers" are tremendously less harmful. Proliferation concerns resolved, waste concerns resolved, ecological concerns resolved, and it moves us further toward being able to actually ACCESS other clean fuel sources that will continue to wean us off petroleum. Its not pie in the sky wind farms, its not a Biomass farm that would have to be the size of Iowa 10 times over to meet our current energy needs. Its here, workable, safe and clean.
__________________
Good Hunting! Captain Haplo ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Very few algae companies dare to touch genetic modification. It gets your company blacklisted in a bunch of nations and ruins your PR. Most just test boatloads of wild algae and find types that fit needs. No need for expensive modification. There are gazillions of breeds of algae. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|