![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Mysterious Canadas
Posts: 99
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This may be off-topic, but I figure this is also the best place to ask, even though this may seem like a stupid question.
Why does the (new) Seawolf class designation start with SSN-21 and on to 22 and 23? Why didn't they start with SSN-774, then start the Virginia with 777? Furthermore, if anyone knows why they went out of sequence, where'd they get twenty-one from? Just something I've always wondered but never found out. Also, I'd like to point out that if this were Star Trek, the USS Seawolf would be SSN-575-A or SSN-28-B or something like that. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
have no idea but i think this belongs in general topics there you might get a better result
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
They named it in an unconventional way. It was SSN-21...Nuclear Submarine for the 21st Century (hence 21). And SSN-22, 23 was logical to follow. The names Connecticut and Jimmy Carter were also unconventional names for U.S. SSN's.
Sea Demon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Mysterious Canadas
Posts: 99
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hmm, never even considered that. :hmm:
Thanks for the reply! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|