New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

And this is where you fail, the burden of proof is on the maker of the claim. You and other religious people claim there is a god, you provide the evidence for its existance, without evidence it is atural to return to the null hypothesis, which in this case is no belief in god.

But I make no claim. You have read too much into the posts. You have claimed their isn't a God, I haven't said there wasn't a Darwin or that his theory doesn't exist. On the contrary, I ask you to explain away the existance of what you don't know. Not being able to explain something doesn't mean it doesn't exist, does it? That is the basis of science, is it not?