Implicit Orders, and ROE

Herman · 07-15-09, 02:04 AM

I believe that you are at fault for the ROE transgression.

You had a really nice command-level crisis. Often, scenario designers use such stringent ViCond as a technique to "rein in" over-zealous commanders like yourself.

By having tough ViConds, he can often prevent a player from indiscriminate destruction and it is a good limitation on the firepower of a particularly powerful side. As you can see, the USN can quite easily devastate the DPRK by itself. The restrictive ViCond was probably used to create such a situation and force you into a command crisis.

So, how about a game of ANW head-to-head, sometime?

07-15-09, 02:04 AM	#3
Herman Ace of the Deep Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 1,187 Downloads: 273 Uploads: 1046	I believe that you are at fault for the ROE transgression. You had a really nice command-level crisis. Often, scenario designers use such stringent ViCond as a technique to "rein in" over-zealous commanders like yourself. By having tough ViConds, he can often prevent a player from indiscriminate destruction and it is a good limitation on the firepower of a particularly powerful side. As you can see, the USN can quite easily devastate the DPRK by itself. The restrictive ViCond was probably used to create such a situation and force you into a command crisis. So, how about a game of ANW head-to-head, sometime? __________________ Guidelines for ScenShare scenarios: 1) Enjoy creating it 2) Enjoy playing it 3) Enjoy sharing it 4) Enjoy helping others create them The PlayersDB - The Harpoon Community's #1 Choice. Harpoon3 Frequently Asked Questions