SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-09, 06:06 AM   #1
Rilder
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl View Post
I have a question for the space buffs out there, and sadly it does not involve the long-awaited ascension of Denmark to the rank of space-vikings, but it is somewhat topical, and has been bugging me for a long time.

Why do we not simply use an aerodynamic aircraft with jet and rocket engines to attain orbit? It would have to be more efficient than just using rockets all the way, right? I thought that was the premise that Spaceship One was based upon. If they can get that thing into low orbit for less than a million dollars, why does everyone continue to insist upon using rockets alone?
Because going straight up is the fastest way out of the atmosphere, if you go in an aircraft style ascent you have to fight the air almost the entire way, by going straight up you get out of the air in as little time and fuel possible allowing you to use your fuel for attaining orbit in a frictionless environment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-09, 11:35 AM   #2
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

To add to the rocket answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HOTOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_Engines_Skylon
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.