Scary stuff on the right

The report was published in April of this year Dude.

So what.

You might try reading something before commenting on it.

Ah reading, lets see.....
I wrote about it being compiled and you came back with published. If you read that you should be able to see they are two different things.
But hey its old news, it doesn't take much of a memory to go back to the news a few months ago. After all the publication did make big news stories
If you can't manage the memory thing then how about a little headline to refresh your memory.

DHS 'Right Wing Extremists' Report Was Ordered by the Bush Administraion

Posted:
04/16/09

So the actual report was started on

January 23rd, 2007

which means for two years it was compiled under the last administration

[August]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

So what.

Making up a headline proves nothing Tribesman, and even if it were true the conclusions that were drawn are pure unadulterated politics.

Making up a headline proves nothing Tribesman

Blame the journalists that wrote it then.
So if you want to prove the headline wrong why not try and prove that the report into extremism was not commisioned under Bush and it didn't start getting compiled on January 23 2007

[mookiemookie]

Don;t you know? If you go down to your local Klan meeting, they're all dyed in the wool liberals! :rotfl:

[SUBMAN1]

This thread is still going on? Is the leftist Communist scared of the right Conservatives? I guess not much changes in this world. Different day, same crap.

I will say however that the left should damn well be scared of the right if the right thinks his 'rights' are being tromped on. The right probably has good reason to get upset as well. The left - looks to pass laws to limit the rights freedoms so that the left can have ultimate control, under the guise of course that what is good for one, is good for all!!! They feel good doing things like this too! The right however seeks to keep freedoms for all and is willing to do what is necessary to open back up those freedoms if that is what it takes.

So take your pick what side you want to be on - robotic controlled dogs on the left who give up their freedom for security, or free loving love your neighbor types that would rather have death if they can't have liberty? Take your pick.

The wealthiest, most prosperous countries the world has ever known follow only one model. I'll let you figure out which one that is.

History buffs will know that Patrick Henry once said, "Give me freedom or give me death". There is no greater power for ones country that to give a man freedom to make his own destiny. Many men with freedom to make their own destiny creates a power so strong that none can resist it. I give you America as an example. Anything else is suppression and a pathetic excuse for existence.

The real question is - Can America fail to fall into the trap of control that seems to be growing ever greater by the day? I have my doubts I tell you. Lets see if America is up to the challenge.

-S

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

robotic controlled dogs on the left who give up their freedom for security, or free loving love your neighbor types that would rather have death if they can't have liberty?

lol wut:

[August]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

lol wut:

Funny cartoon but in spite of all the bashing the Patriot act has recieved at the hands of the liberals they haven't repealed it yet even though they have been in power for almost three years now.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

History buffs will know that Patrick Henry once said, "Give me freedom or give me death".

Actually it was "Give me liberty or give me death!" And true history buffs will know that Patrick Henry was vehemently anti-Constitution, and hated the Federal Government. There is also a chance that he never even said it, as the only account comes from William Wirt, who wrote it seventeen years after Henry's death. There are no actual records, and other accounts claim he used threats of indian attacks and some name-calling to stir up Virginia sympathies against the British.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Actually it was "Give me liberty or give me death!" And true history buffs will know that Patrick Henry was vehemently anti-Constitution, and hated the Federal Government. There is also a chance that he never even said it, as the only account comes from William Wirt, who wrote it seventeen years after Henry's death. There are no actual records, and other accounts claim he used threats of indian attacks and some name-calling to stir up Virginia sympathies against the British.

Correct on all accounts. Someone is rather well-read.

[August]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

Don;t you know? If you go down to your local Klan meeting, they're all dyed in the wool liberals! :rotfl:

Well racial hatred is a pretty liberal concept in this country whereas conservatives tend to favor equal rights and treatment under the law.

[Max2147]

Originally Posted by August

Well racial hatred is a pretty liberal concept in this country whereas conservatives tend to favor equal rights and treatment under the law.

Sure, traditional conservatism advocates equal rights and equal treatment under the law, but so does liberalism. Neither advocates racial hatred, although as we've already established there are racists on both sides of the spectrum.

SUBMAN - What if the right things he's having his rights trampled on, but he's wrong? What if he's feeling oppression that isn't there?

Generally when a radical - be they on the left or right - gets scared, they're not scared of something that's actually happening, they're scared of something that one of their fellow extremists says is happening. It becomes a sort of conspiracy theory circle jerk.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by Max2147

Sure, traditional conservatism advocates equal rights and equal treatment under the law, but so does liberalism. Neither advocates racial hatred, although as we've already established there are racists on both sides of the spectrum.

In a general sense, I also look at policies advanced by both and see liberal policy destroying concepts of personal responsibility in minority circles, promoting a sense of entitlement which creates an unrealistic expectation and government co-dependancy with the liberal minority voter. While I agree that there are racists on both sides, conservatives traditionally put the primacy on equal treatment under the law, while liberals are concerned about "leveling the playing field". More often than not...on racial terms. In these wys, the liberal truly benefits nobody. I'm not saying that's the intent, but intentions suck when you get down to it as applied politically. Racial hatred.???.You be the judge.

Anybody see something similar?