![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ships Secretary
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MilesCity Montana
Posts: 583
Downloads: 614
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
He He He.......
Funny you mention this now. I found my self in a port in Norway the day before the invasion. I just dove to periscope depth and waited for a few hours before all the good guys became bad guys and sank about six mechants that were stationary. I know...cheating...but... I know the future..so...why not use it a little? Well, see you guys latter "I've gotta get Back in Time"
__________________
Just help someone.....it makes a difference |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 33
Downloads: 55
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think it's Algiers. But you are always get a Fiji and a Dido there.
As for the patrols I usually take a day sitting off and watching while plotting them, then when they are right I go in. But that is only with the easy harbours some like Malta I will not touch, I think I have been sunk to many times trying. Grant |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 365
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Dodgy old buisness Harbour Raiding,sometimes theres lots to be had and then others theres nothing at all.Recently in St Helena i got 2 Cruisers and several Destroyers and sundry vessels,but took quite a bit of damage in the process.Plenty of pickings in the area of the Straits of Gib.
__________________
GWX 3.0 GOLD,SH3 Commander. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Docked at Kiel
Posts: 128
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I used to harbor raid in my earlier careers, back in the days when I didnt have 100% realism so I could "cheat" with the external cam and find the subnets and mines. Now that I'm playing 100%, I dont dare go anywhere near a harbor that isn't friendly. I dont want to be caught up in a subnet with a pack of destroyers at angle zero going flank speed
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 51.557, -0.102
Posts: 1,311
Downloads: 177
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Also alot of times you can, for example sink a BB in a given harbour then go and end your patrol. If you return to the harbor before a set date in the campaign files then the ship you just sank will be there again. They are set to spawn at that harbor between two set dates. Ending your patrol resets the spawns I believe. In the Pacific on SH4 I had 5 Yamato Class BBs in one career... not too realistic....
For that reason the tactic felt kinda cheap and easy so I avoid it now... unless I am almost out of fuel and haven't found anything good to shoot at! (Doesn't take long in a Type II ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leicester
Posts: 104
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Back when I was last sailing a type 2 in 1939 almost every patrol ended up with a trip into hartlepool to blow up the T2 oil tanker that was almost invariably there. It seems insane that no one noticed my boat was showing up roughly once every 3 weeks and blowing up an oil tanker in the same spot every time! I carried on doing this until our flotilla switched bases and I moved up to a type VIIC.
__________________
"I say Number one, my end is diving. What the hell is your end doing?" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]()
That's because most simulations have no strategic sense, just a tactical one. The AI doesn't care that it's losing a tanker every three weeks, because all it's prior cargo and warship losses are constantly being regenerated every time you start a new patrol. If the AI had only a finite pool of warships and cargo vessels and was programmed to worry about long-term losses, the game sure would play more realistic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|