![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Which radar ranges (yards) do you prefer in the display? | |||
Stock: 3.000/20.000/60.000 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 73.91% |
Modified: 10.000/20.000/40.000 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 21.74% |
Other! (Explain it and why) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 4.35% |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
I say keep it at option A, as it's both historically accurate, and not much other than battleships could be detected at 30,000 yards. Plus, the 1945 edition of the Radar Operator's Manual notes that the maximum reliable range was, in fact, 30,000 yards.
__________________
![]() ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Russia ®
Posts: 2,492
Downloads: 122
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
At first ... my native system is metrical system ...
![]() Second ... I would like to have historically true parametres ...
__________________
Alex ® ![]() Moses said: "Don't create yourself an idol"... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I don't have used radar in the campaign myself yet but I would also opt for the historical accurate version.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]()
LOL so the most of you admit that 40.000 yards is the maximum reasonable and usable distance, and that 40.000 to 60.000 is just empty space but then you prefer 60.000 because of its historical value?
OK, OK, so be it ![]() Unless a dramatic change in the poll takes place, 3.000/20.000/60.000 will be the scale used ![]() Quote:
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]()
UPDATE:
I'm very happy to report that Anvart's advice wroked as a charm and has allowed me to make all division in the screen equal, thus allowing effectively to create precision scales with high accurancy and in a quick time ![]() Seems that finally different options could be available, after all, but the 60.000 one will ne the first to come out. Thanks for the input guys!
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 462
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Do you need help testing, Hitman?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
What all did you change? This will be important for integration into RFB if/when the time comes.
__________________
![]() ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
The only files touched are the CT .sim and .dat of all submarines. Tweaking the cameras.dat is not necessary, but very convenient for a closer look and better readability. Cheers
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|