PETA get their priorities wrong...Again

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by AngusJS

It's all there in the article. Try and look past your bias for a minute and read it again. You'll notice that PETA never said that they don't care about the fire victims, nor did they insinuate anything of the kind. They merely recommended charging the arsonists with animal cruelty, presumably on top of the other charges. That makes sense; prosecutors often charge defendants with every applicable crime to strengthen their case.

Sometimes dumb people can say smart things. Whatever you think of PETA, in this case they're in the right, which you would have seen if you had actually thought about it rather than just mindlessly react.

Buzzz! Wrong answer! If you re-read what I wrote, what you say here doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. I didn't say this time, I said prior to this.

Go watch my video link above an edumacate yourself. You will be entertained while you watch.

-S

[Task Force]

I wonder what a person from peda would do if they had Roaches in there house.:rotfl:

[A Very Super Market]

Bathe in them :rotfl:

[Task Force]

Let me got my bath...

CRUNCH...

Oah no, I killed one!!! look what I have done. I have comitted crulity to animals... what will the people at the vegi hut think.:rotfl:

[Biggles]

Originally Posted by Task Force

I have comitted crulity to animals... what will the people at the vegi hut think.:rotfl:

You have committed a crime that has no excuse and you will pay with your life!

Now, we cannot use modern weapons,because it's a slight chance that they've been used to butcher innocent animals, so we'll just stick with a somewhat aged method. Everyone is welcome ofcourse!

Unless...Are there any meat-eaters here today?

[Task Force]

:rotfl:

[Biggles]

Originally Posted by Task Force

:rotfl:

You're only making it worse for yourself!

hehee, jest kiddn' mate