SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-09, 12:29 PM   #1
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaQueen
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBlo
Care to share the scenarios? I played your RIMPAC scenario. It was challenging. You should make more and share them.
I'm glad you liked RIMPAC. NATO EXWAR exercise is pretty similar but with an ESG instead of a CSG. I sent in a scenario called NATO ISR exercise to Bill Nichols but it seems to have vanished into the void. He doesn't seem to be updating his site like he used to be. I guess with the Democrats in power he has things to do again.

The mission I'm playing with now is still in the works, but it is definitely promising as one to send in. I actually want to make a campaign some time. I just can't figure out how to make that part of the scenario editor work.
Just played ISR and liked it although it was a little long, returning to the ESG area there wasn't much to see (no shipping or biologics).
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-09, 12:25 AM   #2
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Just played ISR and liked it although it was a little long, returning to the ESG area there wasn't much to see (no shipping or biologics).
That's fair. I've come to the conclusion that really, to do a realistically scaled mission, it's probably going to be kinda long. My own experience with warships is that, frankly, a lot of time at sea is spent sailing around looking at nothing.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-09, 01:21 AM   #3
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

I don't know much about that part of the globe, but how about some merchants transiting out of the port? Unless all merchant shipping has been halted owing to the minefield? (maybe a corridor thru the minefield that merchant shipping uses and a SSK sitting right in the middle to ensure only merchants (not enemy subs) use it.

By the way. Great mission. Got thru it the 1st time and wasn't until I turned on the replay did I see all those mines! Yikes!. Talk about lucky sailing.
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-09, 07:25 AM   #4
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBlo
I don't know much about that part of the globe, but how about some merchants transiting out of the port?
You're right, Trondheim is a major port.

Quote:
Unless all merchant shipping has been halted owing to the minefield? (maybe a corridor thru the minefield that merchant shipping uses and a SSK sitting right in the middle to ensure only merchants (not enemy subs) use it.
I thought about it. I didn't think it was really essential to the mission and it might lead a player to think there was a "right" way to get through, and I don't like to do that. I like things to be more open ended.

Quote:
By the way. Great mission. Got thru it the 1st time and wasn't until I turned on the replay did I see all those mines! Yikes!. Talk about lucky sailing.
The mine barriers shouldn't be terribly effective. It's such a large area to mine that it's hard to put out enough mines out there to be even 80% effective. They might make a decent deterrent, though, if one ship got hit. I threw them out there in a way that would probably be typical of a minefield intended to deter amphibious assault. The hard part of that, though is deciding how much preparation the enemy has to plant mines. I assumed they didn't have much time. A less favorable assumption would be that they had months.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-09, 10:44 PM   #5
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

By the way. My experience with the DW AI is that it automatically classifies any human target it encounters, meaning that it automatically knows whether it is hostile or friendly the instant it is detected (if you look at debug view while the game is running).

Can anyone else confirm?
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 02:34 PM   #6
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaQueen
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBlo
I don't know much about that part of the globe, but how about some merchants transiting out of the port?
You're right, Trondheim is a major port.
I just noticed that the depths for it in DW seem just about right for a Kilo to pull a harbour pentration mission...

Quote:
Quote:
Unless all merchant shipping has been halted owing to the minefield? (maybe a corridor thru the minefield that merchant shipping uses and a SSK sitting right in the middle to ensure only merchants (not enemy subs) use it.
I thought about it. I didn't think it was really essential to the mission and it might lead a player to think there was a "right" way to get through, and I don't like to do that. I like things to be more open ended.
Unless of course the shipping channel has CAPTORs or other mines that discriminate.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 11:19 PM   #7
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Unless of course the shipping channel has CAPTORs or other mines that discriminate.
A little off topic (not to hijack the thread), but were Captor's ever deployed?
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-09, 08:16 PM   #8
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBlo
A little off topic (not to hijack the thread), but were Captor's ever deployed?
Yes. But mine warfare is sort of the ugly stepchild of the US Navy. Both mine sweeping and mine laying are not considered high priorities by them.

Honestly, I'm doubtful that US Navy will ever really use mines on a wide scale. There's reasons that range all the way from the laws of war and humanitarian issues, to the generally risk-averse mindset of Naval officers. If they did lay mines, it'd be very interesting, because it's a really complicated question regarding what they'd be trying to accomplish.

For example, suppose you were mining a harbor, if it was a commerical harbor then you'd be targeting merchant shipping. The thing is, mines don't discriminate between neutral shipping and targeting shipping. These days it's especially important because the shipping industry is so globalized. The shipping companies are TRUELY multinational, changing flags and registries as convenient. So, even if you were targeting, say, Iranian shipping, you'd be most likely hitting vessels belonging to almost every seafaring nation of the world. Since in the US we like to try to obey international law (the previous administration aside), the legalities of this would be complex. The political angles might be every more complex. Suppose you hit a Ukrainian container ship, pulled into an Iranian port, filled with everything from arms to Algerian terrorists to microwave ovens intended for consumption in the US. It gets weird fast. Naval officers don't like weird. They like easy, straightforward and minimal risk. Hence, I'll be amazed if the US ever employs mines in any large quantities.

And if we did use them, they'd most likely be layed by B-52s, B-1s and B-2s. The Navy MIGHT lay a few of them for ceremony's sake, but all by themselves, they can't lay a minefield of any real effectiveness. I mean... come on... if you filled a 688 with mines that'd be only 24. You need more than that to lay a good barrier. Quickstrike mines are the way to go.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-09, 08:03 PM   #9
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Unless of course the shipping channel has CAPTORs or other mines that discriminate.
I'm not sure that'd serve the right purpose. For an amphibious assault, you want to deter the assault by insuring that ANY platform that approaches the coast stands a chance of getting hit. Ultimately your minefield isn't really targeting submarines at all, it's targeting grey hulls and any commercial shipping being used to haul military forces (MPF ships).

You'd use mines that discriminate if you were narrowly targeting specific types of vessels, but to deter amphibious assault, I'd want floating mines in the deep, teathered mines as it got more shallow, right on up to bottom mines in the shallows. I'd want to send out a big loud message "STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM HERE, EVERYONE!!!" Bare in mind, even a small speedboat could contain special operations forces.
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.