SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: Are Oil Companies making too much profit?
Yes 20 51.28%
No 12 30.77%
Don't know or care. 4 10.26%
Other opinion. 3 7.69%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-08, 04:45 PM   #46
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,424
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Let me take a stab at this

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniuk
But are we not forgetting the original point: fuel prices going up and there is no logical relation between the price consumers pay and the production costs....
In business there is no requirement for any relationship between what the consumers pay and the production costs as long as the selling price is larger than the production costs. If I have something that costs me $1.00 to make, I can sell it for $100,000 if that is what the market can bear. In capitalism there is no such thing as "too much profit". There is nothing in business methodology that requires any limitation on selling price based on production price.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniuk
, in this day and age when prices are going up, and they keep announcing record breaking profits, thats f'ing bullschitt, and the smell is coming from big oil.
That smell is called success. Successful businesses make profits. Very successful businesses make huge profits. Any oil executive that is not motivated for larger and larger profits would be fired by the stockholders and for good reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniuk
Common sense, record making profits means overpriced product, because its obviously not costing you alot to produce that product!
Not common sense but emotions. It sucks paying more profit to some company!!!

Oil companies (and pretty much every other company) are not non-profit organizations nor are they providing a public service for the betterment of the citizens. The oil companies only reason for existence is to make profit. As long as they are not breaking any laws or anti-trust regulations, they can make as much profit as the market can bear.

It is unfortunate that for the past 100 years we have chosen to become dependent on one single product for our energy needs -- oil. In a capitalistic society, which American has also chosen to abide by, one can not blame a company from taking advantage of our self dependance.

It is a businessman's dream -- a product where your customers are so used to it that they simply have to buy more. This is money in the bank.

Now it sure would be swell if the oil companies would be nice, considerate, and caring about the people who want the oil but don't want to pay high prices. Unfortunately nice, considerate, and caring are not successful business models when you have a product where the demand is higher than the supply.

For every regular joe who can't afford to buy oil products there are plenty of industries/corporations/countries waiting in line to pick up any surplus. No oil will be going unsold.

I think the oil companies are charging too much for oil.

But as a capitalistic consumer, I think that all merchants charge me too much.

The market is defined by the conflict of two dichotomous desires

The customer wants to buy the product at the lowest price.
The provider wants to sell the product at the highest price.

Perhaps the solution is to find another product we can buy instead of oil for our energy needs? This will take a long long time I am afraid. For 100 years we have never seriously considered any other energy source but oil. We are now paying for that laziness.

"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings."
Julius Caesar (act I scene II)
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-08, 09:22 PM   #47
Brag
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

Don't you think the Iraq dingie wingie goody two shoes nice Bushie-hoochie plays a role?
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away
Click here to look inside Brag's book:
Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books
Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html
For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/
Brag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 08:10 AM   #48
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
If I have something that costs me $1.00 to make, I can sell it for $100,000
Yes you can. Today you can sell it for $15.00 a gallon and it will still sell because we move on oil. Thats why pricing is a matter of national security and why the oil companies shouldn't be allowed to artificially inflate prices. If something stopped the flow of oil to the U.S. and prices rose because of it the government would get involved and remove the problem. We have 12% more oil available this year then last yet the inflation has skyrocketed way past last years rate. Thats profiteering.

Profiteer: One who makes what is considered an unreasonable profit especially on the sale of essential goods.
Some types of profiteering are illegal, such as price fixing.

Quote:
Perhaps the solution is to find another product we can buy instead of oil for our energy needs?
And in the meantime pricing should be regulated.
__________________

bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 08:34 AM   #49
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

In any meaningful analysis, the result is that Americans have been paying too little for their oil.
Environmentally, it doesn;t make sense.
For infrastructure in the US, it doesn;t make sense.
For preparing to cope with a post-oil landscape, it doesn't make sense
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 08:50 AM   #50
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,245
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
In any meaningful analysis, the result is that Americans have been paying too little for their oil.
Take taxes out of the equation and we're paying as much as you Europeans.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is online   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 08:58 AM   #51
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
In any meaningful analysis, the result is that Americans have been paying too little for their oil.
Take taxes out of the equation and we're paying as much as you Europeans.
Most likely, yeah.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 09:34 AM   #52
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,245
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
In any meaningful analysis, the result is that Americans have been paying too little for their oil.
Take taxes out of the equation and we're paying as much as you Europeans.
Most likely, yeah.
So did i miss the point?
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is online   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 09:44 AM   #53
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
In any meaningful analysis, the result is that Americans have been paying too little for their oil.
Environmentally, it doesn;t make sense.
For infrastructure in the US, it doesn;t make sense.
For preparing to cope with a post-oil landscape, it doesn't make sense
What August said about taxes.
As far as Environment and Infrastructure until there is a way to shrink the U.S. to move everything closer together there will be no change. The U.S. is too wide open still and mass transit is a joke because what mass transit we have all runs at an operational loss. The states oversees buses and the feds oversees passenger trains. You couldn't get a public sector company to run either without jacking prices way up which in the end would drive people away from it's use so nothing would be accomplished.
A post oil landscape is a century or more away. The rush should be just to get away from the reliance on oil. Oil companies aren't going to bother doing squat because they have a cash cow in the here and now and there is no incentive for them to change. Getty pushed oil (kerosene) as an cheaper alternative to whale oil. Some whiz just needs to get on the stick for an alternative to oil so they could be wealthier than their wildest dreams. The only never ending alternative is nuclear power and electrical cells. There is no other realistic long term alternative resource out there without causing some other dependency crisis. Bio-fuel just isn't realistic. Hydrogens realistic main supply would be water so thats not a good long term alternative either. The only doable option is some form of high capacity electrical cells.
__________________


Last edited by bradclark1; 05-13-08 at 09:54 AM.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 10:08 AM   #54
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Certainly valid arguments about the size of the country, that's not going to change. But there are ways to get around it. I know France isn't the size of the US, but a proper high-speed rail network could cut an awful lot of those journeys out.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/200...0/the-eh-team/

Decent urban public transport in cities as well. Didn't the car companies buy up the streetcar companies and push everyone onto buses, then shut down the buses to get people into cars? That's an absurdly generalised narrative, but i vaguely remember hearing something like it. Ah well, could be wrong.

But I think that on a cultural, human-geographical level, cheap oil has changed America. The urban landscape is centred around the car, there are even sidewalk-less cities. And let's not get onto cycling

August, you didn't miss the point at all, really.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 11:07 AM   #55
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
I know France isn't the size of the US, but a proper high-speed rail network could cut an awful lot of those journeys out.
We have high speed trains. The problem though is that most of our rail infrastructure is in such a state of disrepair there isn't much high in it's speed.
It doesn't help much that congress keeps lowering the budget so the only money they have is for essentials.
__________________

bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 11:11 AM   #56
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

There's the Acela (I think). I was thinking more along the lines of the TGV/ICE, or the new Spanish Madrid-Barcelona line.
Then again, there's no point in connecting cities by fast trains if you need a car to get around the city when you get there, so this all necessitates a big investment ion public transport. Which means either new taxes or higher existing taxes.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-08, 05:43 PM   #57
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Well the Acela can do 150mph but our rail and bridge infrastructure is so bad it can only reach an average of something like 74mph. In my state there are more than a few parts that 20mph is the highest speed because of the condition of the tracks. The Acela also only runs between Washington DC and Boston. Also over the years the amount of rail lines have reduced and now in many parts of America the track usage is maxed out but nobody wants to build new lines and the freight business is going through a new boom. All in all everybody is aware of our rail problem but nobody and especially our government wants to pay for it's upgrades and repairs.
__________________

bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-08, 01:39 PM   #58
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

http://gas2.org/2008/05/13/californi...ancisco-to-la/

Good news
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-08, 07:43 AM   #59
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
In 22 years. Better late than never I guess.
__________________

bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.