![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,878
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Yamato's magazine exploded as she was sinking, too. I don't think there is a video available, but if you look at a picture of the wreck, you can imagine how big the explosion must have been.
![]() http://www.warship.get.net.pl/Japoni..._wreck_01.html And here's a diagram as well. [img] http://www.finescale.com/fsm/communi...?TOPIC_ID=6350 [/img] ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 41
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oldham, Lancs,England
Posts: 1,312
Downloads: 82
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I wish the BB's ingame could explode like that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Silent Hunter
![]() |
![]()
IIRC 800-plus crew were killed, including the captain. Escorts rescued the admiral on board and a few hundred officers and men. It's always been a bit surprising to me that the ship sank so fast and then exploded. She was a WWI battleship but I thought she was much better protected than, say, the "Hood" and the capital ships lost at Jutland. I guess even the best armored WWI ships just didn't have enough armor, or maybe the design neglected underwater protection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 136
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I don't remember ever seeing that clip, I have seen pictures, but never actual film. Wow, she was over 200 meters in lenght, it gives you the scale of the explosion.
About the cause... to me, it looks like she exploded soon after she rolled over to her side, and first thing I though that the boiler room explosion caused her magazine to explode. Well, ships do explode in SH3, not just that magnitude. SH3 runs smoothly in my computer but explosion are frame-rate killers. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 41
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 53
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
And Tiesenhausen didn't even know which battleship he had attacked, so he couldn't have been aware of the "upgrading" of HMS Barham. Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 41
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Fair enough Seeteufel. I was speculating that the torpedoes were set to run underneath, more than stating it as fact.
However, you're wrong in assuming that the ship wouldn't have capsized. The Barham, in common with all battleships, had a broad beamed flat-bottomed hull for much of its length, when viewed from either ahead or astern. If the torpedo was set to run 1 meter below the keel's depth it would been within that 1 metre distance as soon as it passed the bilge radius, and would have exploded before it reached the ships centre line. Also, while Tiesenhausen might not have known which battleship she was, she would have been in the recognition manual as a Queen Elizabeth class vessel, all of which were modernized in the 1930s with torpedo bulges. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 53
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Aye Ginger Beer, a salute to you and your good arguments!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Grey Wolf
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
DOLPHIN 38 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 41
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|