![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I agree with much that has been said above paricularly as it it applies to opposing the AI or unwary MP sub skippers.
However in MP sub v sub torp engagements are unrealisticaly* longer ranged and require raising tactical considerations above the mechanistic. It is not IMO appropriate to fixate on rigid TMA procedures. More a flexible approach requires course adjustment/s to place target in a beamed lag relative position whilst building the picture. Injudicious change of course as prescribed in zig-zagging could take you from lag to lead throwing an anchor line** on the wary opponents TMA display. This will give away your specific range. The problem, at greater ranges, is that in pursuit of lag you hold a broadly reciprocal course and therefore are opening range. A carefull assessment of means of masking your risky turns and range reduction have to be devised. (Topography, layer, neutrals etc.) *** Initiating TMA techniques should be secondary to good tactics.Much depends on your take on your degree of stealth/surprise and opponents skill/ability to prosper from any careless 'dancing' moves. Edits: * 'Knife fights' 1 - 4 nm it is claimed are 'realistic.' ** Construct your own scenario to observe the 'anchor line' range giver. *** OR just gamble !! Sometimes you have to make a trade-off - giving to get ! Egs. change layer, speed and course early before he catches on !
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity Last edited by Bellman; 01-16-07 at 10:05 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Your turns should make it harder for opponent, not easier .. I don't get this ..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Your thinking defensively !
I hope that we are talking positive aggressive TMA to achieve an accurate firing solution. Nobody said no turns - just dont give anything away easily (''injudicious') 'before you assess which tacking course/s (zig-zagging) will get you a solution before he does. Yep there is a time and place for screwing his solution with speed, depth and course changes. I just like to send my fishes first on the money then I'll worry about fooling his 'solution.' ![]() Edit: Anyway I risk predjucing my own MP so wont add any more to these Fleet course techniques . A Seawolf silently moves out into the estuary - to return ?
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity Last edited by Bellman; 01-16-07 at 11:03 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Edinburgh Jockland
Posts: 199
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Again thanx for replies.
__________________
Whats not to love about Submarines? Long'Hard and full of Seamen!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States, CA
Posts: 195
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Z in my video is nothing more than a clear illustration of what I'm doing. You don't have to make it a Z shape.
I think I will go and experiment with the turn giving away range thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hm ! Interesesting .. must try that .. this calls for change in my tactics .. I play mostly against AI anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've just played few missions against AI and this is really helpful .. anytime target is going from lead to lag (or vice-versa), the place where LOBs crosses is very very close to the place where the target really is.
With lead situation LOB's crossing means maximum range .. with lag it means minimum range .. on transition it means exact range. It can really be deadly in MP I guess, especially if your contact tries to change from lead to lag by itself to get his TMA better. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|