![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: May 2014
Location: In shallow waters
Posts: 388
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
They scrapped Nimrod as to be fair it was long overdue, massively over budget and the numbers to be getting procured were going steadily downwards.
It was a botched programme from the beginning. Typical of BAe Systems. However they should of and could of funded a replacement from existing systems. 8 P-8s should be sufficient. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
"Could of"? "Should of"?
![]() ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|