questions raised on Queen's claim to throne!

[Dread Knot]

Aha! I always suspected she was Kenyan.

[Betonov]

No, I have proof of a Habsburg claim on the British throne.
I should have it typed in an hour

[Cybermat47]

I am now King.

[Oberon]

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

I am now King.

of the jailhouse?

[vienna]

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

I am now King.

Brings to mind this movie:





<O>

EDIT

Try Again...


<O>

[kraznyi_oktjabr]

Originally Posted by vienna

Brings to mind this movie:





<O>

I'm sorry sir, but there is no video there nor a link to anywhere.

[STEED]

Up the Republic.

[Bilge_Rat]

The BBC being the "official" government propaganda site takes a more neutral stand. I smell a cover up.

The instance of female infidelity, or cuckolding, could have occurred anywhere in the numerous generations that separate Richard III from the 5th Duke of Beaufort (1744-1803), whose living descendants provided samples of male-line DNA to be compared against that of the Plantagenet king.

Richard III and his royal rival, Henry Tudor (later Henry VII), were both descendants of King Edward III. The infidelity could, in theory, have occurred either on the branch leading back from Henry to Edward or on the branch leading from Richard to Edward.

Henry's ancestor John of Gaunt was plagued by rumours of illegitimacy throughout his life, apparently prompted by the absence of Edward III at his birth. He was reportedly enraged by gossip suggesting he was the son of a Flemish butcher.

"Hypothetically speaking, if John of Gaunt wasn't Edward III's son, it would have meant that (his son) Henry IV had no legitimate claim to the throne, nor Henry V, nor Henry VI," said Dr Schurer.

The breakage was statistically more likely to have occurred in the part of the family tree which does not affect Royal succession - the most recent stretch - simply because more links in the chain exist there.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30281333