![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia Shipyard Brig
Posts: 1,386
Downloads: 160
Uploads: 19
|
![]()
"I do not think it is unrelated. I actually see better at night with the observation scope than I can with the attack scope"
Original topic is about being seen, not seeing. Most used the night scope (observation) after first contact at long range, even in the daytime because it had better magnification. At closer range they went a few feet deeper and used the attack scope because a 3 inch diameter pole is harder to see than a 6 inch diameter pole. What the OP was theorizing was all the magical psychic detection might be from users raising the observation scope instead of the attack scope at close range, but people are reporting detection from 4000 yards away - at that range a telephone pole wouldn't be visible, ergo which scope is irrelevant. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USS Seal - Somewhere in the Pacific
Posts: 268
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
Close, what I was positing was using the attack scope got you spotted because it stands 5-10 feet taller.
__________________
T. E. Thompson, LTCDR
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Seal (formerly S-40 (SS-145)) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() Quote:
This Psychic Friends scope detection stuff seems to be a TMO phenomenon. I've left my scope up plenty in RFB, without problems. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|