Syria conflict: 'Chemical attacks kill hundreds'

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter

Sorry, the official 9/11 story isn't convincing either. But it is easy to claim it to be true, because it's official.

It's easy to claim it true because the facts are there to back it up.

They are the true rulers, the regents of our world.
They are the guys behind the banks and investment fonds, the guys close to the politicians, the profiters of the wars, the collectors of tax money.

They are not a regular entity, but a changing coalition of interests.
They are like a wolf pack: powerful individuals that come together to hunt.

The most important ones are here: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fed...families/25080

My god! They actually list sources in that one! That's something you dont see
everyday from the CT side.

Waaaait a minute...

David Icke, believes probably in every single conspiracy there is.
Jim Marrs, believes in JFK CT, aliens, telepathy and so on.
Eustace Mullins, believes the jews control the world. Also, a bit of a racist.

So.. sorry, but not very convincing.

I have only limited access and limited time to debunk any concepts. But I don't parrot the official concepts to be on the safe side, the side of the majority, the side that easily mocks others for thinking different.

The only reason you are mocked is because you spout the "think for yourself!" crap, yet you clearly fail to do so yourself. If you would, you'd see
that there is no conspiracy. It as simple as that.

Al Qaeda means list or base or data base. It's used for several issues. As far as I know, Osama was the master of the data base listing the fighters in Afghanistan.
The interpretation of the training camps to be the source for the name is new to me.
Your guys think this is the true, my guys think the other interpretation is true.
Do you have any evidence?

Yep, here's a shot from three diffeferent english - arabic online dictionaries:

It's not that important anyway.

You brought it up, I pointed you were wrong. Kinda eats the credibility of the
article you posted, if the guy cant get even that right.