What is your take?

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by soopaman2

The Atlanta Braves came under the same scrutiny in the past, whats offensive about Braves. Besides someone looking to sue? Or try to cement a legacy by battling the big bad white man, who lord over them now.

As I understand it, the Atlanta Braves controversy was centered not so much around the name, but the imagery the team used. The Tomahawk chop and some of the cartoony stuff like Chief Noc-A-Homa. Same thing with the Cleveland Indians and Chief Wahoo.