Stopping by to gloat....;

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

You can argue as much as you like, but do you have any proof?



So you are mad that he nominated a latino and a jew, and heaven forbid that they were both women. And he's the bigot?

Yes, because it is RACIST to nominate someone just because of their ethnicity, not their merit. Sotomayor is a racist, recall he comments saying "more often than not" a "wise latin" will reach a better decision than a white male? LOL Obama nominates fellow travelers for sure. Kagan, well not sure about any racism from her but shes certainly just as dangerous.

[Tchocky]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

. Kagan, well not sure about any racism from her but shes certainly just as dangerous.

Exactly.

She's Jewish.

Must be dangerous.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

No, it is called literary perspective and narrative. I would expect that someone who claims to be in law school should be able to understand those concept. However, it would not be the first time that I was wrong.

I understand the concept but again, it's a false argument to say his quotes are taken out of context.Want context? This book was authored when he needed money and had no clue he'd be president(this was before soros started being his political sugar daddie) , he was honest about how he felt. I guess Mein Kampf was taken out of context too? lol

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Yes, because it is RACIST to nominate someone just because of their ethnicity, not their merit. Sotomayor is a racist, recall he comments saying "more often than not" a "wise latin" will reach a better decision than a white male?

So every nomination that you don't like is because there is something RACIST behind it. And every minority serving in government is a RACIST. And anyone that disagrees with you is a RACIST.

LOL Obama nominates fellow travelers for sure. Kagan, well not sure about any racism from her but shes certainly just as dangerous.

Some argumentative tips for you:

1. Don't start use internet slang. Just don't.

2. Don't make bold statements and then have to retract them when they are wrong. Read first, re-read second, type third; a variation on the old engage brain then open mouth.

3. Don't follow up your retracted statements with a statement that will have to be retracted as well. Do you have any proof of the danger of Justice Kagan? What has she done?

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

I understand the concept but again, it's a false argument to say his quotes are taken out of context.Want context? This book was authored when he needed money and had no clue he'd be president(this was before soros started being his political sugar daddie) , he was honest about how he felt. I guess Mein Kampf was taken out of context too? lol

So your argument is now down to Godwin. Obama is Hitler. Of course, earlier you said that Obama wasn't Hitler, but that was a retraction of your original post in where Obama was originally Hitler. One of the hallmarks of a conspiracy theorist is the inability to hold positions due to the paper-like strength of their foundational proof. And so, you change your position literally with every post.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Tchocky

Exactly.

She's Jewish.

Must be dangerous.

No! Now, that is taking something out of context lol

Kagan is dangerous because she is an obamaite, shares his illegimate views of big government, executive power not given under the constitution etc. Nothing to do with her being a jew.

Recall I am a big supporter of Israel, argued with tribes over it many times.Never understood why people dislike jews so much actually.Irrational hate basically.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

No! Now, that is taking something out of context lol

Kagan is dangerous because she is an obamaite, shares his illegimate views of big government, executive power not given under the constitution etc. Nothing to do with her being a jew.

Recall I am a big supporter of Israel, argued with tribes over it many times.Never understood why people dislike jews so much actually.Irrational hate basically.

So why the line about those no-good minority women? Again, a retraction due to the indefensible nature of your argument.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

So your argument is now down to Godwin. Obama is Hitler. Of course, earlier you said that Obama wasn't Hitler, but that was a retraction of your original post in where Obama was originally Hitler. One of the hallmarks of a conspiracy theorist is the inability to hold positions due to the paper-like strength of their foundational proof. And so, you change your position literally with every post.

There you go again. I was not comparing him to Hitler, I was asserting given the evidence, his actions as an adult that he still harbors the angry racial feelings. I was being sarcastic saying "I guess Mein Kampf was taken out of context as well?" lighten up sally.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

There you go again. I was not comparing him to Hitler, I was asserting given the evidence, his actions as an adult that he still harbors the angry racial feelings. I was being sarcastic saying "I guess Mein Kampf was taken out of context as well?" lighten up sally.

From your first post:

On September 13, 2012, the Dept of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps youth, aka the Homeland Youth. Image courtesy of DHS.gov.

The federal government calls them FEMA Corps. But they conjure up memories of the Hitler Youth of 1930’s Germany . Regardless of their name, Obama’s Dept of Homeland Security has just graduated its first class of 231 Homeland Youth! Kids, aged 18-24 and recruited from the President’s AmeriCorp volunteers, they represent the first wave of DHS’s “Youth Corps”, designed specifically to create a full time, paid, standing army of FEMA Youth across the country!

On September 13, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security graduated its first class of FEMA Corps first-responders, “Homeland Youth”. While the idea of having a volunteer force of tens of thousands of volunteers scattered across the country to aid in times of natural disasters sounds great, the details and timing of this new government army is somewhat curious, if not disturbing!

From the post in question.

I understand the concept but again, it's a false argument to say his quotes are taken out of context.Want context? This book was authored when he needed money and had no clue he'd be president(this was before soros started being his political sugar daddie) , he was honest about how he felt. I guess Mein Kampf was taken out of context too? lol

You're really bad at this, kid.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

So why the line about those no-good minority women? Again, a retraction due to the indefensible nature of your argument.

I didn't say a thing about no good minority women.There you go again, trying to twist things that just are not true.I said obama nominates people based on their ethnicity, which is inherently racist.I then added how Sotomayor herself has made alarmingly racist statements .People have a right to be racist.However, they do not have a right to use positions they obtain to apply that racism.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

I didn't say a thing about no good minority women.There you go again, trying to twist things that just are not true.I said obama nominates people based on their ethnicity, which is inherently racist.I then added how Sotomayor herself has made alarmingly racist statements .People have a right to be racist.However, they do not have a right to use positions they obtain to apply that racism.

Again, your own words, kid:

Show me how obama is no longer in what you call a phase? Obama's use of the race card, only appointing minority women to the supreme court, his actions in various incidents I previously listed shows he is still that angry, bigoted young man at heart.

I can do this all day. You've typed yourself into a real corner here.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

From your first post:



From the post in question.



You're really bad at this, kid.

Actually, I do quite well at this.You know I have had several messages from people on here who say "I agree with you but not sure why you keeping arguing with these people, they are beyond help.I just do not argue because the ladies on here jump on anyone who is not pro obama." I did not compare him to Hitler but one can not ignore some similarities.

I don't think obama is planning mass murder or anything like that.However, I know his ideology is marxist in nature, with his own hangups on race mixed in.Obama thinks he is savior of this nation and given the means and opportunity, he would exploit it and consolidate as much power as possible.Obama is also aware that chance may not happen but he would like to do his bit, to make it easier to move towards the nation he believes we should be, thinking in the long run, it will work out for him.I know he despises our constitution and wants to as he said "fundamentally change america". Well the fundamentals of the country, individual rights, economic liberty, the pursuit of happiness are fine, it's crap of so called "progressivism" that is the problem, it's been around a while, managed to snake its way into our system and is the root of most problems.

Sotomayor is a racist, recall he comments saying "more often than not" a "wise latin" will reach a better decision than a white male?

Context young man, context.
Provide the actual quote and include the preceeding qualifiers.
since you claimed to be a legal proffessional(before you later stated that you were starting at law school)perhaps you can point out where her actual statement was faulty on a point of law.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Again, your own words, kid:



I can do this all day. You've typed yourself into a real corner here.

lol I haven't, you keep saying that, trying to twist it.I used to respect you a bit, but you seem to have drank the kool aid. ah well

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Actually, I do quite well at this.You know I have had several messages from people on here who say "I agree with you but not sure why you keeping arguing with these people, they are beyond help.I just do not argue because the ladies on here jump on anyone who is not pro obama." I did not compare him to Hitler but one can not ignore some similarities.

Right. Like a guy that gets hit by a truck and mutters "but...I'm.......okay......" Every point that you have made has been countered, and repeatedly. You just can't bring yourself to face the fact that the things you have been told are simply not true. I do have simpathy for you, as I have been down that road too. In fact, such empathy is the only reason that I am having this conversation with you.

I don't think obama is planning mass murder or anything like that.However, I know his ideology is marxist in nature, with his own hangups on race mixed in.Obama thinks he is savior of this nation and given the means and opportunity, he would exploit it and consolidate as much power as possible.Obama is also aware that chance may not happen but he would like to do his bit, to make it easier to move towards the nation he believes we should be, thinking in the long run, it will work out for him.I know he despises our constitution and wants to as he said "fundamentally change america". Well the fundamentals of the country, individual rights, economic librty, the pursuit of happiness are fine, it's the poision of so called "progressivism" that is the problem, it's been around a while, managed to snake its way into our system and is the root of most problems.

So you're changing your position.....again. And if I were to deconstruct that one, like I did to your others, you will change it once more and we can have another go-around on the endless wheel of absurdity. Nothing I haven't seen before.