![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
To be honest...I do ponder if Soviet and American generals and politicians would have been so reluctant to use a nuclear weapon in action had they not used two on Japan already and seen the destruction that they caused.
The two bombs on Japan could well have prevented several being used on China during the Korean war. After all, no-one really believes in the destructive force of something until they witness it for themselves in action. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
A most interesting comment. There was consideration for the US to "drop" the first nuclear weapon on an island as a show of capability. This was not adopted for several reasons, both logical and emotional. 1. There was not enough 235U for a second uranium device 2. Implosion construction was still pretty new and uncertain. This is why the PU device was equipped with contact single point ignition fuses as a back up so that there would be "some" explosion, and the device would be destroyed to prevent examination. 3. It would be a lot easier to over look a "dud" if it were dropped in combat, then if it were part of an advertised and witnessed "demonstration". But your comment is most interesting to consider. Did we, in fact, destroy two cities in order to save the world? hmmmm
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 562
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Unit 731.
And in other news: Rape of Nanking. Etc. Now, do the deaths and murder of those innocent people justify the deaths of yet another thousands of innocents on the Japanese side? No they don't. The death of innocent people can naturally not be "justified". But war itself is not just. I don't know war because I've never been to one, but I think it is safe to say that by its nature, it is the opposite of justice, decency, compassion and sympathy. It is when these things end, that war starts. So, while the death of tens of thousands of people in 2 nuclear attacks is not "just" in any event, the above examples show what kind of enemy the US and Allied Forces were up against in the Pacific as well. And in light of the timid recognition of their own horrible atrocities, I would have a hard time with the Japanese demanding an apology for the nuclear attacks. Either everybody apologizes to everybody for any wrongdoing that might have happened (well, aside from waging war on one another in the first place), or better, gives it a rest. The only sincere apology / real peace settlement can only be between individuals, anyway. Most everything else is just politics.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|