SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Son of Pilot Who Dropped A-Bomb Opposes, (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=173207)

Gerald 08-05-10 06:10 AM

Son of Pilot Who Dropped A-Bomb Opposes,
 
Plan to Send U.S. Delegation to Hiroshima Ceremony.EXCLUSIVE: The son of the U.S. Air Force pilot who dropped the first atomic bomb in the history of warfare says the Obama administration's decision to send a U.S. delegation to a ceremony in Japan to mark the 65th anniversary of the attack on Hiroshima is an "unsaid apology" and appears to be an attempt to "rewrite history."


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ny/?test=faces

Raptor1 08-05-10 06:37 AM

*grabs popcorn for the inevitable 'bomb shouldn't have been dropped' argument*

HunterICX 08-05-10 06:49 AM

Hey...who stole my popcorn! :stare:

HunterICX

Oberon 08-05-10 06:59 AM

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3389/...850537ff5c.jpg

Someone want some more popcorn?

Dowly 08-05-10 07:01 AM

I would call that respecting the victims of World War II.

goldorak 08-05-10 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendor (Post 1460270)
Plan to Send U.S. Delegation to Hiroshima Ceremony.EXCLUSIVE: The son of the U.S. Air Force pilot who dropped the first atomic bomb in the history of warfare says the Obama administration's decision to send a U.S. delegation to a ceremony in Japan to mark the 65th anniversary of the attack on Hiroshima is an "unsaid apology" and appears to be an attempt to "rewrite history."


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ny/?test=faces


Can I say what b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t ?

The drop of the 2 bombs were justified only from an economical standpoint (remember how much money the Manhattan project cost the US taxpayers ? ) a ROI if you want for the military industrial complex; and as an act of leverage against the Soviets.
All the talk about the bombing being necessary because it would have saved lives etc... is only that. Talk without substance. If the bombs were not dropped the US would have invaded Japan at the earliest by the end of 1945, and it was well known that the japanese government wanted to end the war by the time the Potsdam conference was in effect. Truman and Stalin deliberately decided to ignore the Japanese message.

The drop of the 2 bombs effectively ended the war. The reason for using them (propaganda aside, the evergreen motto "to save lives") on the other hand has nothing to do with saving lives. And history, and historical documents show this very clearly.

joegrundman 08-05-10 07:26 AM

Every year there is a ceremony to mark the Hiroshima bombing, and every year the US sends a delegation.

Gerald 08-05-10 08:35 AM

This "thread" was posted with original text and link,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by goldorak (Post 1460290)
Can I say what b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t ?

The drop of the 2 bombs were justified only from an economical standpoint (remember how much money the Manhattan project cost the US taxpayers ? ) a ROI if you want for the military industrial complex; and as an act of leverage against the Soviets.
All the talk about the bombing being necessary because it would have saved lives etc... is only that. Talk without substance. If the bombs were not dropped the US would have invaded Japan at the earliest by the end of 1945, and it was well known that the japanese government wanted to end the war by the time the Potsdam conference was in effect. Truman and Stalin deliberately decided to ignore the Japanese message.

The drop of the 2 bombs effectively ended the war. The reason for using them (propaganda aside, the evergreen motto "to save lives") on the other hand has nothing to do with saving lives. And history, and historical documents show this very clearly.

from foxNews and nothing else! I know well the story both before and after, and there are reasons for them strategic decision was taken during WWII,and if you have any relevance to "tread" is known as BS as above, only that it is a bad mail is not what it contains, you must be able to separate this!

TLAM Strike 08-05-10 08:44 AM

Remember this. Every Purple Heart awarded since the end of WWII to the present day (Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other conficts) all were minted for Operation Downfall the Allied invasion of Japan.

500,000 were made. 120,000 are still in stock.

tater 08-05-10 08:48 AM

I've met his grandson (he's a B-2 pilot), as well as General Tibbets himself. His son is right.

The japanese should thank us for the a-bombs, they saved countless JAPANESE lives.

Some goon asked General Tibbets if he had visited the Hiroshima Memorial when I saw him give a talk. He said "I've only been to Hiroshima the one time, and I didn't stop."

Everyone laughed except the hippie.

tater 08-05-10 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1460341)
Remember this. Every Purple Heart awarded since the end of WWII to the present day (Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other conficts) all were minted for Operation Downfall the Allied invasion of Japan.

500,000 were made. 120,000 are still in stock.

500k would not have been enough I fear.

Then there is the standing jap order to murder all POWs upon invasion. Note that in September, this would have resulted in the murder of all POWs in the CBI when the brits would have invaded Malaya. The death toll just from already ordered POW murders would have exceeded the death toll of BOTH a-bombs.

Raptor1 08-05-10 09:00 AM

Not...this...time...

Ah, whatever.

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldorak (Post 1460290)
Can I say what b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t ?

The drop of the 2 bombs were justified only from an economical standpoint (remember how much money the Manhattan project cost the US taxpayers ? ) a ROI if you want for the military industrial complex; and as an act of leverage against the Soviets.
All the talk about the bombing being necessary because it would have saved lives etc... is only that. Talk without substance. If the bombs were not dropped the US would have invaded Japan at the earliest by the end of 1945, and it was well known that the japanese government wanted to end the war by the time the Potsdam conference was in effect. Truman and Stalin deliberately decided to ignore the Japanese message.

The drop of the 2 bombs effectively ended the war. The reason for using them (propaganda aside, the evergreen motto "to save lives") on the other hand has nothing to do with saving lives. And history, and historical documents show this very clearly.

What messages were they ignoring? The Japanese government had no intention to unconditionally surrender at this point, they rather would have accepted an end to the war with some outrageous demands that included no occupation, conducting their own war crimes trials by themselves, disarming the IJN by themselves and other such blatant nonsense.

And wouldn't it have saved lives? Take a look at the buildup of forces on both sides and the estimated casualties for Operation Downfall; it's quite clear that dropping the atomic bombs would have been much preferable to an invasion on both sides.

mookiemookie 08-05-10 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptor1 (Post 1460352)
And wouldn't it have saved lives? Take a look at the buildup of forces on both sides and the estimated casualties for Operation Downfall; it's quite clear that dropping the atomic bombs would have been much preferable to an invasion on both sides.

10-15,000 planes held in reserve for kamikaze attacks. Massed forces on the southern end of Kyushu. Aviation fuel, ammo stockpiled. Doesn't sound like "about to surrender" to me.

SteamWake 08-05-10 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joegrundman (Post 1460302)
Every year there is a ceremony to mark the Hiroshima bombing, and every year the US sends a delegation.

True, but this is the first year we are poised to 'apologize'.

Oberon 08-05-10 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptor1 (Post 1460352)
Not...this...time...

Ah, whatever.

Bad Raptor! :nope: :haha:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.