Ship length in Recognition manual [Nasty Hack]

Skyhawk · 08-23-09, 11:14 PM

@ "theluckyone17

I understand exactly where you are coming from now. I had thought that you agreed with RR not only in exercising some caution going down this road but in his rhetoric directed at the OP as well. That was an over assumption on my part and I apologize to you for that. It was my bad. No sarcasm intended, I am being sincere.

"You ignore my intent in favor of a straitjacket dictionary definition but choose to inventively interpret "nasty hack." Yeah, I see where you're coming from: consistency in reasoning!"

-RR-

The repeated use of the words vandal and/or vandalism in a negative context does not leave much room for subjective interpretation. Please enlighten us - If a "straightjacket" definition isn't correct, then exactly what was your intention and meaning behind using those terms if nothing less than to imply the OP deliberately and with malice did something both morally and legally criminal?

Perhaps instead of playing semantics and demonstrating your proficiency at "keyboard karate" you should try using your perceptiveness to take my comments in context.

As far as the term "nasty hack" goes, I think most would agree that my interpretation makes much more sense and has more plausibility than yours.

Do you honestly think the OP came here to proclaim that he has done something illegal and tried to share it with the rest of the subsim community? Not too mention the fact that he thought he'd get away with same? Ludicrous. Oh yes, that's right, you never implied or suggested such a thing.

I have presented an opposing point of view in disagreement with yours. You respond to me in typical fashion with semantics instead of sound reason.

Good for you. I can assure you that I found it very amusing to say the least.

You really should try to quit taking yourself so seriously.

For me, I'm out as I have better things to do with my time and know better than to try and reason a differing point of view with you. It has the same chance as you apologizing to the OP for your false accusations about his intent when creating this mod which are based soley on YOUR subjective assumptions and interpretation.

The only reason this topic became an "issue" at all is because you did your best to make it one, period.

I can assure you, the sky is in fact, NOT falling.

Have a nice day!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

08-23-09, 11:14 PM	#27
Skyhawk A-ganger Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 79 Downloads: 18 Uploads: 0	@ "theluckyone17 I understand exactly where you are coming from now. I had thought that you agreed with RR not only in exercising some caution going down this road but in his rhetoric directed at the OP as well. That was an over assumption on my part and I apologize to you for that. It was my bad. No sarcasm intended, I am being sincere. "You ignore my intent in favor of a straitjacket dictionary definition but choose to inventively interpret "nasty hack." Yeah, I see where you're coming from: consistency in reasoning!" -RR- The repeated use of the words vandal and/or vandalism in a negative context does not leave much room for subjective interpretation. Please enlighten us - If a "straightjacket" definition isn't correct, then exactly what was your intention and meaning behind using those terms if nothing less than to imply the OP deliberately and with malice did something both morally and legally criminal? Perhaps instead of playing semantics and demonstrating your proficiency at "keyboard karate" you should try using your perceptiveness to take my comments in context. As far as the term "nasty hack" goes, I think most would agree that my interpretation makes much more sense and has more plausibility than yours. Do you honestly think the OP came here to proclaim that he has done something illegal and tried to share it with the rest of the subsim community? Not too mention the fact that he thought he'd get away with same? Ludicrous. Oh yes, that's right, you never implied or suggested such a thing. I have presented an opposing point of view in disagreement with yours. You respond to me in typical fashion with semantics instead of sound reason. Good for you. I can assure you that I found it very amusing to say the least. You really should try to quit taking yourself so seriously. For me, I'm out as I have better things to do with my time and know better than to try and reason a differing point of view with you. It has the same chance as you apologizing to the OP for your false accusations about his intent when creating this mod which are based soley on YOUR subjective assumptions and interpretation. The only reason this topic became an "issue" at all is because you did your best to make it one, period. I can assure you, the sky is in fact, NOT falling. Have a nice day!