Everyone should have a chief of staff !

[AVGWarhawk]

Originally Posted by Enigma

Actually, this thread tends to make fun of the typical conservative, without even trying. Go figure....

Please explain

[UnderseaLcpl]

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

Please explain

I think he's referring to percieved overreaction to this event, even when in jest. M.O. most likely intended her statement to be a compliment to her staff, and/or a joke. Obviously, she is not so naive as to think that everyone can obtain a staff. Nobody is that stupid.

Of course, I am just guessing because Enigma rarely makes any kind of clear point. Evidently conservatives are so far beneath him that their opinions do not warrant his consideration or comment. It's a pity that the rest of us are too biased or ignorant to understand his opinions, otherwise he might take the time.

What I think he fails to understand is the objection to government officials(especially democratic ones, being "for the people" and all) being treated like royalty. But I really wouldn't know. All I have to go on is his occasional one-liners, and one post where he responded with an actual opinion because I accused him of the same thing he is doing now.

Originally Posted by Platapus

Well no. The rest of us do not hold a position in the Executive Office of the President nor do we have a Public Law authorizing a staff.

It goes with the position.

Enigma, if you want to make succinct arguments, can't they be more like this? This argument actually has a point besides simply assuming that conservatives are stupid. A beneficial discussion could be built on it.
I've yet to meet the person who questioned their own judgements because someone called them an idiot.

[AVGWarhawk]

I understand she was joking and making light of it. Just wondering what Enigma is saying or is it just an enigma?

[UnderseaLcpl]

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

I understand she was joking and making light of it. Just wondering what Enigma is saying or is it just an enigma?

Like I said, I think he's percieving an overreaction. He thinks that you're not joking. But once again, that's just a guess.

[August]

Well I at least was not kidding, exaggerating or overreacting. We really do have cats!

[Aramike]

I think he's referring to percieved overreaction to this event, even when in jest. M.O. most likely intended her statement to be a compliment to her staff, and/or a joke. Obviously, she is not so naive as to think that everyone can obtain a staff. Nobody is that stupid.

Of course, I am just guessing because Enigma rarely makes any kind of clear point. Evidently conservatives are so far beneath him that their opinions do not warrant his consideration or comment. It's a pity that the rest of us are too biased or ignorant to understand his opinions, otherwise he might take the time.

What I think he fails to understand is the objection to government officials(especially democratic ones, being "for the people" and all) being treated like royalty. But I really wouldn't know. All I have to go on is his occasional one-liners, and one post where he responded with an actual opinion because I accused him of the same thing he is doing now.

Best summary of Enigma. Ever.

He does tend to treat those of views alternative to his as below him, yet he never seems to have anything substantive to say in rebuttal.

It would seem he's gotten things backwards...

[Platapus]

Originally Posted by August

Well I at least was not kidding, exaggerating or overreacting. We really do have cats!

Where you made your mistake is in the statement

The cats are our support staff.

As everyone who has a cat knows: Cats are not support staffs, cats HAVE support staffs.

Dogs have owners, cats have staff.

[AVGWarhawk]

Originally Posted by August

Well I at least was not kidding, exaggerating or overreacting. We really do have cats!

I have a cat. He eats cheezbrgrz He can haz cheezbrgrz

[August]

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

I have a cat. He eats cheezbrgrz He can haz cheezbrgrz

Aren't you over-reacting?