![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Most "realistic" subsim? | |||
Aces Of The Deep |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 8.33% |
Silent Hunter III + mods |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 41.67% |
Silent Hunter V + mods |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 33.33% |
UBOAT + mods |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 8.33% |
Wolfpack |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 25.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have tried all of them.
right now, I would say WOLFPACK is hands down the most realistic: manual targeting, TDC, Hydrophone, rec manual, number of ships, diving and depth keeping modelling, systems modelling, wave and ocean modelling is miles ahead of other subsims. re: SH5. I bought it when it came out and have played with most mods, but it was an aberration from the start. Ubisoft tried to create a subsim that would appeal to casual players and it never properly worked. Modders have managed to make it more palatable, but it is still simpler at all levels than WOLFPACK. p.s. - I see you did not include SH4 in your poll. IMHO, it is the best of the SH series. It improved on SH3 and it was not dumbed down like SH5.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|