SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Sub/Naval + Other Games > Sub/Naval & General Games Discussion
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-03-14, 10:48 AM   #11
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 40,633
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0


Default

The graphical mark of the wound on the body must not always necessarily represent the calculated impact point, so never judge that by the wound you see on the body. Especiaqlly obvious that is with arrow, which may stick at angles and parts of the body where they did not hit. The visual aspect there sometimes is somewhat "generic". What counts is the calulcation of the shot and impact point.

Since the change of the ballistics I have only fired the 9.3x62, 8x57 and the .454. The 9.3 seems to have more dropping power but also doing greater damage to trophy integrity at short and medium ranges, with maybe also greater bullet drop at high ranges (I had severla 200m shots). I also noted that I had a higher miss rate, and more wobble in the scope, which has piunished my skill level with that wepakn, dropping it from 94% to below 91% in short time (and killing my nerves successfully). I have over 300 shots with that rifle, and level 7, so one can say I am quite used to that rifle.

The .454 still is like a door slammed into the face of the animals you shoot at.

On the 8x57 I cannot say anything, i had too few shots with that one since the change, just two I think.

I had no shots with the 6.5x55 since the change.

Bows and shotgun with birdshot are unaddressed by the changes, so no changes should be noted there.

I currently hunt either blackbear or for achievement raise with the .454, and need 8 more kills, once I got those, I will examine the 6.5x55.

The higher penetration chance for buckshot is being criticised. Penetration is not what buckshot is killing with.

The damage model is being criticised as well due to the way the 3D model maybe has the inner organs slightly misplaced, or too big/too small. This could lead to the phenomenon that you complained about. Ballistics have nothing to do with that. I occassionally wonder about the result of a shot, but it is not the rule, and as long as I get the kill, I do not care too much.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.