![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#22 | ||
Hellas
![]() |
![]() Quote:
hello Rubini , i made some more extensive tests and the results are DEFINETELY much much better with AmbientLightColor and ReflectLightColor setted to 0-0-0 (just for the testing purposes) . i created a new mission with the target 'showing' us all of its hull (AoB=90) for being as easily as possible spoted . i have send you this mission (and something more) to test at your yahoo mail ,make a check there ! here is the results of my tests as for the detect ranges: i run the same mission 10 times on pure NYGM installation (no mods enabled and no tweaks at NUGM's files): 1. 8400 m 2. 13900 m 3. 10200 m 4. 13300 m 5. 14100 m 6. 12200 m 7. 13600 m 8. 13000 m 9. 11900 m 10. 10400 m then i run the same mission again 10 times but with AmbientLightColor and ReflectLightColor setted to 0-0-0 and here are the results at detect ranges: 1. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! 2. 7900 m 3. 5600 m 4. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! 5. 2600 m 6. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! 7. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! 8. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! 9. 200 m 10. TARGET NOT SPOTED AT ALL ! so , as you can see , the AmbientLightColor and ReflectLightColor are definetely giving better results ! BUT i think that it is absolutely NESECCERY to start by locating what is causing this randomness to detect results and ELIMINATE this randomness during the development - tests (see the second pack results...there is one 7900 m !!!). that way ,we will be able then to have secure results as for the 'effectivness' of AmbientLightColor, ReflectLightColor and light factor's at cfgs files check your pm at yahoo mail , i am very curius to see your results ![]() Quote:
__________________
Knowledge is the only thing that nobody can ever take from you... ![]() Mediafire page:http://www.mediafire.com/folder/da50.../Makman94_Mods |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|