Wikileaks hacked ahead of new document release

Catfish · 12-02-10, 05:40 AM

Hello,
it is interesting that all people here want to kill Assange, while no one cares about what has been brought to light.

I take it when atrocities to the civilian population done by the SS in 1941 leaked out, it would be perfectly ok with you to kill the publisher ?

The point is not that wikileaks published how the US sees german politicians, the (Ras)Putin clown or Berlusconi (the US are perfectly right in judging, and i would have been able to tell exactly this to the US long before lol), but that the last wars were wars of aggression, and the killing of hundred thousands civilians was considered as necessary and accepted, by "democratic" governments. This is just to show that those crazy conspiracy theories obviously are not really theories.
The point is that everyone with a half pound of brain would have expected this, but now there is proof.

I also think they did not hack all, since the most interesting details about the international banking systems have not been published. This is still due for early 2011.

The internet will be heavily censored in the future, but it may be that - since it is a world-wide web - they will not manage to get it censored entirely - at least as long as companies like Google do not voluntarily support e.g. the chinese government by only letting pass censored chinese government information.

The point that "Assange plays with fire" is imho due to the fact that most of those cold war warriors have not yet accepted that we are indeed living in a new age of information, and responsability. More people are better educated than ever, and they are indeed waking up. Obama knows that, but his own advisors do not.
Governments will not be able to do the most atrocious things undercover anymore, at least without that being brought to light sooner or later.
I think this is a good thing. If you prefer to be belied and blinded, it is your decision. But then do not criticize the german population of 1933 to 1945 of having been "blind".

Greetings,
Catfish

12-02-10, 05:40 AM	#11
Catfish Dipped Squirrel Operative Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky Posts: 17,820 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	Hello, it is interesting that all people here want to kill Assange, while no one cares about what has been brought to light. I take it when atrocities to the civilian population done by the SS in 1941 leaked out, it would be perfectly ok with you to kill the publisher ? The point is not that wikileaks published how the US sees german politicians, the (Ras)Putin clown or Berlusconi (the US are perfectly right in judging, and i would have been able to tell exactly this to the US long before lol), but that the last wars were wars of aggression, and the killing of hundred thousands civilians was considered as necessary and accepted, by "democratic" governments. This is just to show that those crazy conspiracy theories obviously are not really theories. The point is that everyone with a half pound of brain would have expected this, but now there is proof. I also think they did not hack all, since the most interesting details about the international banking systems have not been published. This is still due for early 2011. The internet will be heavily censored in the future, but it may be that - since it is a world-wide web - they will not manage to get it censored entirely - at least as long as companies like Google do not voluntarily support e.g. the chinese government by only letting pass censored chinese government information. The point that "Assange plays with fire" is imho due to the fact that most of those cold war warriors have not yet accepted that we are indeed living in a new age of information, and responsability. More people are better educated than ever, and they are indeed waking up. Obama knows that, but his own advisors do not. Governments will not be able to do the most atrocious things undercover anymore, at least without that being brought to light sooner or later. I think this is a good thing. If you prefer to be belied and blinded, it is your decision. But then do not criticize the german population of 1933 to 1945 of having been "blind". Greetings, Catfish