![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#10 | |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fresno, CA.
Posts: 581
Downloads: 95
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The Year is 2010.........and you mention Mass Effect 2? You can't even use FSAA in that game. If anything spits in the face of modern day PC capabilities it's not being able to enable FSAA. BFBC 2 is good (my favorite FPS) but needs improvements graphically, and I haven't played Assassin's Creed 2. Regarding the year, what exactly does 2010 have to do with it? Feel free to name another simulator that looks better than SH5. FS9? Nope. FXS? Nope. Dangerous Waters? Nope. SB Pro PE? Nope. Silent Hunter 3/4? Nope. Lomac? Nope. FC2? Nope. DCS : BS? Nope. Ship Simulator? Nope. Knights of the Sea? Nope. IL-2? Nope. Wings of Prey? Maybe...but not up close. So, "nope" there as well. WWII Online? Nope. RoF? Nope. If you think the games you mention above look better than SH5, than that is your opinion...it certainly isn't mine. The only thing I would really change graphically are the explosions, and I would put those back to how they were in SH3/SH4. SH5 has great graphics if you have the hardware to run it. Anybody who says the graphics are bad either: A) Have lower-end hardware or B) Have unrealistic expectations. Lastly, if this game is the worst you have ever played......you have not played many games. lol SH5 does need a lot of fixes, but a graphical failure it is not.
__________________
Ark -------------- Vista 64-bit SP1 Asus P6T Deluxe mobo Core i7 920 @ 3.8ghz 6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 Evga GTX 285 SSC SB X-FI Fatality 640GB WD "Black" Dell 3007WFP-HC 30" LCD / Acer 23" H233H Last edited by Ark; 03-30-10 at 02:08 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|