Black Panthers threatening voters outside of Philly polls?

[August]

http://www.collegeotr.com/university...with_one_14209

[Thomen]

Originally Posted by August

http://www.myfoxphilly.com/myfox/pho...011&isP16=true

http://www.collegeotr.com/university...with_one_14209

Slow poke! /jk

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...81&postcount=9

[Zachstar]

Lets see here.

Faux and Rush... Hmmm that is a tough one.

Only thing I can come up with is desperation and denial. The african American is about to become president so all the sudden you decide to dive into 2004 and say the same thing dems were saying just reversed for obvious purposes.

Deny all you want. It is on the path to acceptance as neoconservatism dies.

[August]

Originally Posted by Zachstar

Lets see here.

Faux and Rush... Hmmm that is a tough one.

Only thing I can come up with is desperation and denial. The african American is about to become president so all the sudden you decide to dive into 2004 and say the same thing dems were saying just reversed for obvious purposes.

Deny all you want. It is on the path to acceptance as neoconservatism dies.

Huh? This is happening today, now, not in 2004. Geez Zachstar you had better ramp up your Dem defense because you're going to be doing it a lot over the next 4 years if your man wins...

[Thomen]

Originally Posted by Zachstar

Lets see here.

Faux and Rush... Hmmm that is a tough one.

Only thing I can come up with is desperation and denial. The african American is about to become president so all the sudden you decide to dive into 2004 and say the same thing dems were saying just reversed for obvious purposes.

Deny all you want. It is on the path to acceptance as neoconservatism dies.

Wrong thread? :hmm:

[August]

Originally Posted by Thomen

Wrong thread? :hmm:

No doubt that's what he'll claim but i'm betting knee jerk reaction without checking the out the link.

[Digital_Trucker]

Originally Posted by Zachstar

Lets see here.

Faux and Rush... Hmmm that is a tough one.

Only thing I can come up with is desperation and denial. The african American is about to become president so all the sudden you decide to dive into 2004 and say the same thing dems were saying just reversed for obvious purposes.

Deny all you want. It is on the path to acceptance as neoconservatism dies.

So because you say that voter intimidation happened in 2004, that it's OK for it to happen now because they're Democrats doing it and not Republicans. That's a very logical explanation

[JSF]

Originally Posted by Zachstar

Lets see here.

Faux and Rush... Hmmm that is a tough one.

Only thing I can come up with is desperation and denial. The african American is about to become president so all the sudden you decide to dive into 2004 and say the same thing dems were saying just reversed for obvious purposes.

Deny all you want. It is on the path to acceptance as neoconservatism dies.

Don't hate.....